12.6% or 82% Spontaneous Abortion Rate for Pregnant Women who get the jab?

[kalibeltfeeder]

Table 3 sputter

[SPUTTER]

Wrong table bud. Read the fine print under table 4.

[kalibeltfeeder]

Wrong table? It’s the same study of the same participants! Did you read the report?
So Yeah exactly..read it! 827 have reported a completed pregnancy, the other 3,000+ In the study hadn’t completed their pregnancies by the time of the report.

[bootstrap]

Where are you getting those numbers? This is the table directly from the study.



I should've been clearer, I meant the author of the study is being misleading.

^^^ This.

For the Participant-Reported Outcome 'Spontaneous abortion <20wk', the V-safe Pregnancy Registry numbers read 104/827 (12.6). The numbers should read 104/127 (81.9)

[SPUTTER]

Hahahaha

[kalibeltfeeder]

It may but "is it"? in this particular study?
.

Miscarriage=spontaneous abortion
They’re one in the same, show me anywhere where they mean something different.

[bootstrap]

Miscarriage=spontaneous abortion
They’re one in the same, show me anywhere where they mean something different.

Arguing over definitions, classic tactic. How about watching the video starting around 4:30 where definitions are discussed?

Then get back to the data point: For the Participant-Reported Outcome 'Spontaneous abortion <20wk', the V-safe Pregnancy Registry numbers read 104/827 (12.6). The numbers should read 104/127 (81.9)

[theduracellbigd]

How about leave the original title alone? C'mon Trollstrap, when you edit your original thread title from the original outlandish statement: "82% Spontaneous Abortion Rate for Pregnant Women who get the jab" to what it is now, it might confuse some of the objection from the start. At least your trying I guess.

[kalibeltfeeder]

Arguing over definitions, classic tactic. How about watching the video starting around 4:30 where definitions are discussed?

Then get back to the data point: For the Participant-Reported Outcome 'Spontaneous abortion <20wk', the V-safe Pregnancy Registry numbers read 104/827 (12.6). The numbers should read 104/127 (81.9)

I watched the video it’s garbage and
I’m not the one who brought up the semantics over definitions..

The study is following 3958 participants only 827 have reported outcomes. So the number should read more like 104/1132 for the 1st trimester or 127/1132 for the less than 20 weeks group, the denominator could be higher in the less than 20weeks group though because we don’t know where the vaccinations occurred during the 2nd trimester of the 1714 who received their vaccinations during the 2nd trimester. (If it was before or after the 20 weeks)

That 104/127 number is just the amount of women who have had miscarriages in the first trimester, the remaining 23 had theirs in the 2nd presumably.

104/127 miscarriages out of 1132 is right in line for normal (non vaccinated) pregnancy results.

[hunterb]

That 12% is right in the usual average of 10 to 15% for miscarriages in the first 20 weeks. Shocking

THIS.

Big nothing burger. Confirmation bias. Spreading FUD used to be a bannable offense.

Now these conspiracy theorists are a CalGuns protected class…

[bootstrap]

Guess you didn't read the footnote for the 12% number?

[theduracellbigd]

Bootstrap edited the thread title, it started as,"82% Spontaneous Abortion Rate for Pregnant Women who get the jab"
He then got hammered on his fake news flash Troll activity.
Then he edited title to what it is now . Hmmm??
Let it die Trollstrap, it was bunk, intended or not.
Check your sources, check your math, otherwise you might get a big HAHA

[SPUTTER]

It's not hard to understand. This article goes over it.

https://vachristian.org/new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions/

[kalibeltfeeder]

It's not hard to understand. This article goes over it.

https://vachristian.org/new-study-re...ous-abortions/

That article is garbage just like the ops original post. The NEJM study does not support those claims.

[Den60]

In the early rushed trials. These drugs are in phase 3 of the rushed trials.

Healthy people don't need the vaccine. This is especially true with young people. Most who get pregnant are young and the young life they are carrying are not at risk.

But, we have the pro-government, pro-vacccine idiots on here saying this is all good despite the fact that we can show that the governmnet/CDC, lied about masks, lied about the risk of outdoor transmission, and lied about the origin of the virus. I'm sure if I took more than the two minutes I took to post this I could find other lies that our government have done. But, yeah, we are supposed to trust them.