My SIG 522 is so ugly I bought a 556 so I could have TWIN uglies! I bought
the SIG because at the time it seemed to FUNCTION with any type of ammo
and so far mine has. S&W has had problems right out of the gate with ammo
and "blown" extractors---this to me is unacceptable. A 22LR should
work with any type of 22LR ammo--to have a list of non recommended ammo is
not the answer. My SIG with BUIS is accuracy to the extreme. I can hit the
smallest targets @50 yds at ASR just about 10 for 10 with it(standing offhand). It came out
of the box with a nice trigger,also. Pete
the SIG because at the time it seemed to FUNCTION with any type of ammo
and so far mine has. S&W has had problems right out of the gate with ammo
and "blown" extractors---this to me is unacceptable. A 22LR should
work with any type of 22LR ammo--to have a list of non recommended ammo is
not the answer. My SIG with BUIS is accuracy to the extreme. I can hit the
smallest targets @50 yds at ASR just about 10 for 10 with it(standing offhand). It came out
of the box with a nice trigger,also. Pete



And, fwiw, the "toy" you dismiss has worked fine for us and actually has working controls exactly like on our AR. Good for junior when he graduates to 5.56 imho. Same "toy" sends the little tiny .22LR round down the range very accuratly, and despite the bad-mouthing by some in this rimfire section we've found the M&P 15-22 to be really fun and a worthy addition to the safe.
Wondering...where did your 50% figure come from? The majority of people I've talked to (AND read about on the freakin' web) have seemed to enjoy their S&W and have had little to no probs with them. Nice to see the people who have had probs had them takin' care of by S&W and seem to remain happy with their rifles.
Comment