Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Chromed 1943 Ithaca....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lvanbrunt2
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 12

    Chromed 1943 Ithaca....

    Attached Files
    Larry
    USMC 82-86

  • #2
    GM4spd
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2008
    • 5682

    Nothing wrong with the opinion of Mark,however,unless you can get some
    real documentation from old Ithaca archives about it being a presentation
    piece, I don't think it has any extraordinary value. Pete

    Comment

    • #3
      highpower
      Calguns Addict
      • May 2012
      • 5319

      You always buy the gun, not the story. Without some kind of documentation, all it is a WWII 1911-A1 that was chromed. Nearly all chrome is what is called triple plating. That is, first a layer of copper is applied, then a layer of nickel, and lastly a layer of chrome. Any quality shop that chromes car bumpers does it the same way. I can see no way that it could be established that it was a presentation gun at this point in time.

      It could be restored and the cost for a decent restoration would likely be around $400-600 depending on who does the work. To restore it, the chrome would have to be electrolytically removed and the gun reparked.

      At the prices that WWII 1911's are fetching nowadays, I would opt to not worry about whether it may be some mythical presentation piece, and have it restored properly.

      My opinion is that it was chromed after the war by someone that wanted to pimp out their gun.
      MLC member.

      Biden, proof that stupid people shouldn't be allowed to vote.

      Dumocraps suck balls.

      Comment

      • #4
        beetle
        The Clip guy
        CGN Contributor
        • May 2009
        • 1677

        My thoughts as a collector who has seen and handled a large number of original and collectable M1911A1s:

        * Every single factory presentation pistol that I have observed had the original finish used by the factory at that time. (The exception is the 1,000,000 Remington Rand which was gold plated).

        * The government kept control of the serial number blocks. Presentation/demo/experimental pistols had to be serialized outside of the assigned serial number block. For example, Remington Rand used "ERRS " in front of non-government pistols. Ithaca has been known to use "XP" and others.

        * Presentation/demo/experimental pistols would not have the cross canon mark behind the right grip -- as they are not owned and accepted by the government.

        So the fact that this pistol has a production serial number AND the cross canon stamp makes me think that this was indeed a "regular" production pistol accepted into service. My opinion is that it is not a factory presentation piece, and therefore the chrome plating significantly detracts from collector value.

        Comment

        • #5
          zinfull
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          CGN Contributor
          • Aug 2006
          • 2733

          The pistol looks like it was buffed. Presentation guns do not get buffed from the factory. Just a pimp 45, part of history so why change the gun.

          Comment

          • #6
            lvanbrunt2
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2015
            • 12

            more pics

            Thank you all for the feedback.
            Attached Files
            Larry
            USMC 82-86

            Comment

            • #7
              Discogodfather
              CGN Contributor
              • Feb 2010
              • 5516

              It looks nice the way it is, why even restore?
              Originally posted by doggie
              Someone must put an end to this endless bickering by posting the unadulterated indisputable facts and truth.
              Originally posted by PMACA_MFG
              Not checkers, not chess, its Jenga.
              "The California matrix of gun control laws is among the harshest in the nation and are filled with criminal law traps for people of common intelligence who desire to obey the law." - U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez

              Comment

              • #8
                morrcarr67
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jul 2010
                • 15053

                Originally posted by lvanbrunt2
                Thank you all for the feedback.
                Ivan I know you're new around these parts but I would really listen to this man. His knowledge base is very deep in these guns.

                Take a look at this thread. It will link you to many of the other threads he has written.



                Originally posted by beetle
                My thoughts as a collector who has seen and handled a large number of original and collectable M1911A1s:

                * Every single factory presentation pistol that I have observed had the original finish used by the factory at that time. (The exception is the 1,000,000 Remington Rand which was gold plated).

                * The government kept control of the serial number blocks. Presentation/demo/experimental pistols had to be serialized outside of the assigned serial number block. For example, Remington Rand used "ERRS " in front of non-government pistols. Ithaca has been known to use "XP" and others.

                * Presentation/demo/experimental pistols would not have the cross canon mark behind the right grip -- as they are not owned and accepted by the government.

                So the fact that this pistol has a production serial number AND the cross canon stamp makes me think that this was indeed a "regular" production pistol accepted into service. My opinion is that it is not a factory presentation piece, and therefore the chrome plating significantly detracts from collector value.
                Yes you can have 2 C&R 03 FFL's; 1 in California and 1 in a different state.

                Originally posted by Erion929

                Comment

                • #9
                  Tom-ADC
                  Veteran Member
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 3614

                  Looks better than mine, somebody installed S&W revolver sights and tried their hand at engraving on it. Shoots great doesn't care what you feed it, but I'd sure like to have it untouched.
                  US Navy Retired, NRA Lifetime member. Member CRPA

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    lvanbrunt2
                    Junior Member
                    • Jan 2015
                    • 12

                    Thank you for the feed back, I've passed it along!!
                    Larry
                    USMC 82-86

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      lvanbrunt2
                      Junior Member
                      • Jan 2015
                      • 12

                      .......

                      ......and for the education and links!!
                      Larry
                      USMC 82-86

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      UA-8071174-1