Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hypothetically Speaking--Using C & R when SHTF

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    jwfire25
    Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 477

    Originally posted by DennisCA
    I would prefer the SKS



    (I have two [emoji1] )
    Agreed! I just couldn't pass up the rifle that won WWII. Lol

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • #17
      TS77
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 1697

      Technically theres gotta be c&r AKs and ar15s floating around out there...

      Comment

      • #18
        870classic
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 460

        Originally posted by Spyder
        More people should own 1919s.
        ^^^ +1 This.
        And an M2 and/or M16 Quad 50.

        Best regards,
        870classic.

        Comment

        • #19
          Tere_Hanges
          Calguns Addict
          • Mar 2013
          • 6270

          If really SHTF, NOTHING will be legal, and legality will not matter. Anything goes in SHTF. I'm guessing at a minimun there will be martial law, curfew, stay at home orders, extreme surveillance, concentration camps, checkpoints, no water, no power, no food, chaos, looting, fires, etc...
          Last edited by Tere_Hanges; 12-13-2020, 8:43 PM.
          CRPA and NRA member.

          Note that those who have repeatedly expressed enough vile and incoherent content as to render your views irrelevant, have been placed on my ignore list. Thank you for helping me improve my experience and direct my attention towards those who are worthy of it. God bless your toxic little souls.

          Comment

          • #20
            The Gleam
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2011
            • 13117

            C&R = 1970 and older.

            When one says "no modern guns" that's somewhat of a misnomer, because many guns designed or build since about 1910 still falls into a category of those guns still being produced today.

            Any number of revolvers, even magnums (the S&W .357 Magnum 1935), and when you consider the Hi-Power (1935) was only discontinued just last year, and the 1911 (because 1911) and its clones are still in production, not to mentioned many different lever-actions since 1873 and so on, there are plenty of options that are modern, that aren't modern. The SIG P210 is essentially a 1949 design. The "modern" semi-auto Browning BAR in numerous calibers (not THE CAR) got it's start in 1967.

            It doesn't have to be a cosmoline caked and pantina'ed military surplus, or of flint/match lock antiquity to fit this purpose.

            So much to choose from pre-1970, whereby when I got some of those things back in the 1980s, they still seemed like new guns to me. (i.e., imagine yourself buying a year 2000 to 2010 production gun now - would you call it an "old gun".)
            -----------------------------------------------
            Originally posted by Librarian
            What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

            If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

            Comment

            • #21
              risingsun212
              Member
              • Oct 2016
              • 305

              Comment

              • #22
                mausercat
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 504

                My Inglis Hi-power was still being used in Canada as of this year. It is very reliable and I have plenty of Hi-Cap mags from 20 years ago. I even have a shoulder stock holster that I never attach, but in the SHTF times I can attach it and I have a short carbine.

                Comment

                • #23
                  pitfighter
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 3141

                  SHTF - a very sad state of affairs, I was in a couple of places that had civil wars* and it is not anything any sane person would want a part of.


                  Reality - 2" .357 in absolutely hidden-holster, no permit, no warning - will surprise you and then make a Jackson Pollock out of you.
                  I practice with the .357 and am used to it, and the way it shoots, it's the same age as me, so we're both a years or so away from being curio and relics.

                  *A WW2 battle rifle strapped to an overweight middle aged Calguns addict would last about .13 seconds in any real conflict, as a trained solider (without an old gun fetish) looking for armed combatants clocks you waddling towards the 7-11 to refill your slurpee and red-mists your medulla oblongata from 1.5 KM away.
                  That's how it works, in my limited experience.
                  Last edited by pitfighter; 12-14-2020, 9:21 AM.
                  Pitfighter.
                  CA/AZ

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Donkeypunch0420
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1460

                    SKS or M1 carbine for close engagements. Out of all my rifles, I think I prefer one of my Swede Mausers for anything at distance.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      IronsightsRifleman
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2020
                      • 1010

                      With an M1 carbine and an M1 rifle you have everything you need to go fast and furious or hot and heavy.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Spaffo
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2013
                        • 1348

                        1969 SKS and 1957 GCNM 1911, until I could " liberate" something with a higher rate of fire. LOL

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Cowboy T
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 5725

                          M1 Garand, because it's semi-automatic, strongly built, and fires a cartridge that will stop an assailant cold. Clips are compact and you can carry plenty with you to keep the rifle fed. "The .30-06 is never a mistake."

                          After that, a Mosin, especially a Finnish Mosin, or a British Enfield for its slick, fast operation.
                          "San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
                          F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah!
                          http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos)
                          http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast)
                          http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel)
                          ----------------------------------------------------
                          To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Dano3467
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 7381

                            Salvage from boating accident

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              The War Wagon
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 10294

                              Rule #1 of SHTF:

                              "Run, whut ya' BRUNG."
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                blkside
                                Senior Member
                                • Dec 2012
                                • 1301

                                Is it really a discussion if it makes no sense at all. SHTF means instant compliance with unconstitutional laws? I must have read the wrong memo. SHTF means BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
                                Originally posted by TonyNorCal
                                If I'm going to spend money to touch a woman then it's going to be at a Nevada brothel, on Craiglist hooker, or trolling the streets in a camper van.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1