It seems that I recall stories of prosecutors charging homeowners in these situations when the homeowner fired a warning shot. The argument is, if you fired a warning shot, you must not have thought your life was in danger, so you committed an assault with a deadly weapon.
And while I'm sure no prosecutor in California would do such a thing (rolls eyes), I can see a similar argument against using plastic bullets. If you're not so afraid that you must kill the intruder to save your life (or your family's), you probably shouldn't be shooting.
Of course, IANAL, and YMMV.
And while I'm sure no prosecutor in California would do such a thing (rolls eyes), I can see a similar argument against using plastic bullets. If you're not so afraid that you must kill the intruder to save your life (or your family's), you probably shouldn't be shooting.
Of course, IANAL, and YMMV.
Comment