Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Should I buy .223 or 5.56?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    bjl333
    C3 Contributor
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Dec 2009
    • 7010

    Originally posted by Cuda440
    Damn, I just checked mine, and you're right. I bought 300 rounds, and shot 240 of it at Iron sights, they even ran a magnet over the box first, but they didn't catch it i guess. Now I'm curious about why the tip is magnetic, is it a copper jacketed steel projectile?
    They probably got some metal in the lead. Lead was expensive a little while ago. I think they called it bi-metal or something like that.
    Wanna learn to shoot SKEET? I am here to introduce all shooters to the sport of SKEET Shooting ....
    CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT >>> SoCal Skeet Clinic
    SKEET SHOOTING CLINIC
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #32
      lanwarrior
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 566

      Originally posted by temecula
      1k 5.56 55g WWB at $300.
      Where did you get this price?

      Cheapest I can get so far is $350:

      Winchester 5.56 NATO M855 62-grain green tip ammo delivers military-grade accuracy. 1000-round bulk pack for serious shooters. Stock up!

      Comment

      • #33
        Nathan Krynn
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 2107

        Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
        How about a Wylde chamber? Do those do what they claim to do (be accurate with either round)?
        This is the info I got from some competition shooters I know.

        Wylde was not designed to be used with both 5.56 and .223. It was designed to use long 80+ grain bullets loaded hot to shoot long range like service rifle competition. To be able to load them hot they made the chamber able to fit 5.56 brass and chamber pressures. The leads are further out to accommodate the OAL of the longer 80+ gr bullets. So they will not be as accurate with 5.56 ammo or .223 ammo due to the bullets having to jump so far to the leads.

        Due to this it was not designed to use both ammo types but special hand loaded ammo, being able to use both ammo types was a side affect but will not be as accurate with them as a 5.56 with 5.56 ammo or .223 with .223 ammo or even 5.56 with .223 ammo.
        Nathan
        Tactical Machining
        1270 Biscayne Blvd
        Deland, FL 32724
        Phone 386-490-4464
        fax 386-490-4890

        Comment

        • #34
          stphnman20
          Calguns Addict
          • Feb 2005
          • 6583

          Originally posted by lanwarrior
          Where did you get this price?

          Cheapest I can get so far is $350:

          http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/AMM223C-5.html
          Thats for 62gr. 55gr will be cheaper.

          Comment

          • #35
            stphnman20
            Calguns Addict
            • Feb 2005
            • 6583

            I saw Miwall selling this for $95 at the Ventura gunshow 2 weeks ago.

            Widener's Reloading and Shooting Supply has ammo and reloading supplies for sale at cheap prices. Find out why we're the best deal on the web today!

            Comment

            • #36
              xxINKxx
              Veteran Member
              • Jun 2008
              • 4289

              Originally posted by dieselpower
              I don't know about you guys, but I have NEVER seen 5.56 at Walmart.

              .
              I dont even think ive seen 556 for sale ever, not even at gun shows or at stores. Everything is always 223

              Ive always shot 223 outa my 556 AR, no accuracy issues, i only shoot a couple hundred yards max. But its still dead accurate wherever the red dot is pointing at
              "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." - Thomas Jefferson

              Comment

              • #37
                killshot44
                Veteran Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 4072

                Originally posted by Nathan Krynn
                Wylde was not designed to be used with both 5.56 and .223. It was designed to use long 80+ grain bullets loaded hot to shoot long range like service rifle competition. To be able to load them hot they made the chamber able to fit 5.56 brass and chamber pressures. The leads are further out to accommodate the OAL of the longer 80+ gr bullets. So they will not be as accurate with 5.56 ammo or .223 ammo due to the bullets having to jump so far to the leads.

                Due to this it was not designed to use both ammo types but special hand loaded ammo, being able to use both ammo types was a side affect but will not be as accurate with them as a 5.56 with 5.56 ammo or .223 with .223 ammo or even 5.56 with .223 ammo.
                The only informative post here. Wylde is not a compromise between two chamberings.

                The .223 vs 5.56 thing again? Really?

                Comment

                • #38
                  bomb_on_bus
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 5492

                  Originally posted by Vbp6us
                  So my AR-15 is finally built and I want to go to the local range for some shooting, only problem is, do I buy 5.56 rounds or .223? My upper is a Spikes Tactical 5.56 mid-length. I know the obvious answer is "5.56, duh" but why is it that the local Walmarts only have .223?

                  And what's up with the weird pricing for Federal rounds? I mean, are these supposed to be the cheapest or the most expensive? I ask because when I ask for the cheapest 9mm rounds, the clerk always gives me Federals. For .223, Federals seem to be the most expensive...clue me in on ammo please.

                  Thank you
                  DUDE your avatar picture had me crackin up!
                  Originally posted by aklon
                  In 1775 we stood up.

                  In 1776 we announced we would not be sitting back down.

                  sigpic
                  Ahhhhhhhhhhh! Man that was some great Kool-Aid.......... hmmmmmm theres a hint of something metallic. Oh well guess I will get on with the voting.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    stix213
                    AKA: Joe Censored
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 18998

                    Originally posted by dieselpower
                    I agree with others....223 for fun, 5.56 for work. Sight your optics with 5.56 and just put up with having to use Kentucky windage for .223.
                    Personally I think its a bad idea to practice on one round but in an emergency situation plan on using another. I think the advantage of having your rifle perform EXACTLY as how you practice is much more important than the slight edge using 5.56 NATO over .223 Rem could give you. So I don't really understand this suggestion to sight in 5.56, but practice with .223 improperly sighted.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1