I really need to get some .556, I just have Prvi 62gr .223.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should I buy .223 or 5.56?
Collapse
X
-
-
Damn, I just checked mine, and you're right. I bought 300 rounds, and shot 240 of it at Iron sights, they even ran a magnet over the box first, but they didn't catch it i guess. Now I'm curious about why the tip is magnetic, is it a copper jacketed steel projectile?Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
Thomas JeffersonComment
-
5.56 chamber and 1:7 twist rifling if you want to be able to shoot heavier grain bullets accurately. You'll be able to shoot lighter ammo and .223 ammo but not vice versa if you have a .223 chamber with a 1:9 twist. Options are always nice to have.Last edited by Average Joe American; 09-19-2010, 9:50 AM.Comment
-
I don't know about you guys, but I have NEVER seen 5.56 at Walmart.
I agree with others....223 for fun, 5.56 for work. Sight your optics with 5.56 and just put up with having to use Kentucky windage for .223.Comment
-
go with .223, it's cheaper.Comment
-
This is strange to me. At least regarding for example: .308 v. 7.62 nato. I've read that rifles chambered for .308 win. can easily handle the lower pressures of 7.62 nato but 7.62 nato rifles are less safe to shoot the higher pressure .308 win. rounds. Why is .223/5.56 the opposite of this?
So um... moon labia or something.Comment
-
Comment
-
so the issue is not settled?The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.Comment
-
This is strange to me. At least regarding for example: .308 v. 7.62 nato. I've read that rifles chambered for .308 win. can easily handle the lower pressures of 7.62 nato but 7.62 nato rifles are less safe to shoot the higher pressure .308 win. rounds. Why is .223/5.56 the opposite of this?
http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html
From my understanding Remington originally came up with the .223 and when it was standardized it became the 5.56mm NATO and Winchester followed them coming up with the current .223.
The 7.62 NATO was born from the 30-06. Winchester copied the round and named it .308 to take advantage of the standardization. I suppose a standardized military round creates a specific ingredient, whereas commercial ammo has more flexibility with their loads. It just so happend that the military load for 7.62 NATO wasn't as hot as Winchester's .308 but the 5.56mm NATO is hotter than most commercial .223.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,854
Posts: 25,012,823
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,860
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 2923 users online. 137 members and 2786 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment