New ACOG received with SCRATCHES! UDATE on first post

[KING_PALM]

Ha, I am PRETTY SURE that youre kidding, did you notice that the photobucket account that came from has the same user name as my calguns account? And I just think its silly that we have there, their, and the're (haha, is that last one even correct?), so I just use there for all three.

No, It is not correct.

[Casual_Shooter]

Wouldn't a call to the retailer be a first step before getting too upset?

[evolixsurf]

why the fark wont you name the place? So we can make the same mistake? Thats bullshiat what happened and I would call my credit card company and report it IMMEDIATLY. I would make the retailer send a shipping label and take it back.

[evolixsurf]

who ever sends a scope out like that is a straight dirt bag and has bad business practices.

[The DRis]

What kind of response is that 10%? I was gonna do business with you before the Obama craze but ended up not. Think I'm glad I didn't. If you want to post stuff like that I suggest you don't do it under your business name. Just my opinion

[MasterYong]

What kind of response is that 10%? I was gonna do business with you before the Obama craze but ended up not. Think I'm glad I didn't. If you want to post stuff like that I suggest you don't do it under your business name. Just my opinion

Dude... 10% was KIDDING. It was a joke. When you're on this forum all the time, you often see folks calling BS on other members when they report a problem with a vendor. However, usually when a CGN member calls BS on a story, it's because the story is so unbelievable, and the one complaining immediately names the vendor. Factors like that make the story look like a smear campaign. In this case, the guy's being a gentleman until he gives the vendor a chance to sort it out, by not naming the vendor in question. Also, in some cases, folks call BS for seemingly no reason when the story is in fact legit. Don't know if you read the recent BOHICA incident (kaboom), but CGN members went nuts in that thread calling BS and making all kinds of assumptions about operator error, faulty products, etc that were unfounded based on the facts given. 10% was making an ironic joke.

The part about it being a "DOJ shill thread" was pretty obvious.

So yeah. 10% was kidding. If you were kidding as well, then I apologize in advance for my little rant.

[Jpach]

Dude... 10% was KIDDING. It was a joke. When you're on this forum all the time, you often see folks calling BS on other members when they report a problem with a vendor. However, usually when a CGN member calls BS on a story, it's because the story is so unbelievable, and the one complaining immediately names the vendor. Factors like that make the story look like a smear campaign. In this case, the guy's being a gentleman until he gives the vendor a chance to sort it out, by not naming the vendor in question. Also, in some cases, folks call BS for seemingly no reason when the story is in fact legit. Don't know if you read the recent BOHICA incident (kaboom), but CGN members went nuts in that thread calling BS and making all kinds of assumptions about operator error, faulty products, etc that were unfounded based on the facts given. 10% was making an ironic joke.

The part about it being a "DOJ shill thread" was pretty obvious.

So yeah. 10% was kidding. If you were kidding as well, then I apologize in advance for my little rant.

Ha sometimes one can never be too sure. When I first read his post I was thinking WTF, I thought this guy was cool before. But the more and more I read, the more I realized nothing really added up right (DOJ shill) so I knew it had to be a joke. But again, sometime its hard knowing whos joking and whos not over the internet

[MasterYong]

Ha sometimes one can never be too sure. When I first read his post I was thinking WTF, I thought this guy was cool before. But the more and more I read, the more I realized nothing really added up right (DOJ shill) so I knew it had to be a joke. But again, sometime its hard knowing whos joking and whos not over the internet

Actually... I was only being sarcastic. 10% was being serious. This guy is a DOJ shill!!!

[The DRis]

I guess I retract then. I totallybmissed the sacrasm in his typing. A few smileys go a looong way

[nrakid88]

BUMP for an update!

[-hanko]

-----UPDATE-----
So I am going to let the cat out of the bag, the company was BotachTactical, maybe this was a mistake on there end, but either way its not acceptable in my eyes to ship out merchandise that costs $1100 in the condition that I received it (really, how hard is it to check what your shipping out?)

I honestly don't konw how much this detracts from the value, or if I can even trust this optic, god knows where its been and how it got those marks, or even if the retailer can be trusted.

So you've been with calguns.net for almost 2 years & you've never head mention of Botach in a non-complementary context??...pleeease

Hard to believe.

-hanko

[nrakid88]

I read reviews of them that said they are hard to contact, and send out the wrong stuff sometimes, and a few calgunners said botach isn't that bad, so I took a chance. Getting a scratched up ACOG was not one of the risks I was weighing when i pulled the trigger... yet still I knew Botach was a risk.

[xm177]

Botach FTW. Again.

[NiteQwill]

My word of advice to ANYONE on this forum.

Only deal with Botach if you are LEO/MIL only.

Why? Because you can walk in and pick your order up straight from their location in LA, if you don't like it, you don't pay. All you did was waste gas money.

Otherwise, stay FAAAAAAR away from them.

[HK Dave]

Gotta love Botach.