Sorry if the title sounds loaded... the question has more to do with round count than "stopping power".
I've had my eye on a Glock 36 for quite a while now (especially if the Peruta case creates changes in CCW permits). It makes sense to me because I've already got a 1911 and would only need to buy one caliber of ammo. I've held one and it feels great in hand. Haven't had a chance to shoot one yet.
All the research I've done online notes - very specifically - that the Glock 36 is limited by its small round count (being 6 + 1). Most comparisons say to either get the Glock 30 or get a 9mm/.40 with higher round count (like a Glock 26/27 for example).
My question is this: why would people worry about the Glock 36's 6+1 round count of .45ACP when it seems people are flocking to the M&P Shield (7+1, 8+1), Various Kahrs in 9mm (6+1,7+1), and XDs (7+1, 8+1).
Now I do realize that the Glock 36 is slightly bigger in size than the aforementioned 9mm, but those round counts are very similar. Am I missing something?
I've had my eye on a Glock 36 for quite a while now (especially if the Peruta case creates changes in CCW permits). It makes sense to me because I've already got a 1911 and would only need to buy one caliber of ammo. I've held one and it feels great in hand. Haven't had a chance to shoot one yet.
All the research I've done online notes - very specifically - that the Glock 36 is limited by its small round count (being 6 + 1). Most comparisons say to either get the Glock 30 or get a 9mm/.40 with higher round count (like a Glock 26/27 for example).
My question is this: why would people worry about the Glock 36's 6+1 round count of .45ACP when it seems people are flocking to the M&P Shield (7+1, 8+1), Various Kahrs in 9mm (6+1,7+1), and XDs (7+1, 8+1).
Now I do realize that the Glock 36 is slightly bigger in size than the aforementioned 9mm, but those round counts are very similar. Am I missing something?
Comment