Taurus curve .380

[Captiontom]

so does your index finger activate the laser, your middle finger is on the trigger and your ring finger on the grip?

[Alexander831]

Id pass and get another lcp better

[BigL]

Who was drinking during the design... This is from all those people who *****e about "its too heavy to carry, it prints" ....

This idea is retarded

[Justintoxicated]

The bore axis looks to high.

[keenkeen]

It'd be hard to qualify at 25 yards without ANY sights, but it's a neat concept for a gut gun.

Even with a freakin lazer?

[five.five-six]

Still better looking than a Glock.

[five.five-six]

Blasphemer!!!!!

I speak that TROOF!

[rugerkp]

Still better looking than a Glock.

^^^

[Jay-El]

With apologies to The Princess Bride...

Dear God, what is that thing?

[sigfan91]

I guess Taurus doesn't think left handed people need to own this.

That's easy. There will be a left-handed version and then an "ambidextrous" version.

One gun, 3 models.

[Occams Rasor]

I prefer sights on my guns

and something to hold on to.

[tsoiky]

Taurus curve .380

You put that thing on a desk and people think it is pencil sharpener with LED.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Merc1138]

LOL. I took a look at the patent for this thing... wtf. They had better hope that nonsense prevails for their marketing team, because this is the only instance I can think of where making a pistol FATTER is being sold as more concealable.

http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=08752322&IDKey=52A0714EF0CC%0D%0A&

Fig. 1 and Fig. 8 make it really obvious what they did to "curve" the frame.

[blackrat]

the idea is sound, if it works than what's the problem? they took a situation and developed a gun around it versus taking a gun and changing it to fit the same situation. in theory it makes more sense than taking duty/military sidearm and shrinking it down.

whether it works is something we will have to wait and see. aren't glocks going through the same "but it's different" argument that started 30 years ago?

[Merc1138]

the idea is sound, if it works than what's the problem? they took a situation and developed a gun around it versus taking a gun and changing it to fit the same situation. in theory it makes more sense than taking duty/military sidearm and shrinking it down.

whether it works is something we will have to wait and see. aren't glocks going through the same "but it's different" argument that started 30 years ago?

Did you look at the drawings in the patent? If they didn't fatten up the sides to give it a curved appearance, it would be slimmer than it already is. If the goal is to obscure the outline of it, holsters do that(which you should be using anyway. Not that stupid clip).