In pondering the issue of reliability,I've come to the concept that its pointless insofar as typical gun users are concerned.
Let's take a 1911 vs Glock 21.Both handguns will easily last at minimum 5,000 rounds,and probably beyond.But let's play into the stereotype.5,000 rounds of practice .45 ACP will cost about $4500 at current prices.If one has that kind of cash,an outlay of $1500 for a backup piece is pocket money. Assuming the 1911 breaks first-ive seen Glocks fail too- the owner merely bundles up the piece and sends it back to the factory for repair,during which time the spare gun is carried.Further, let's remember that most civil defense situations are over as soon as the gun is presented to the attacker.
As such,for those of us who commute to work by car instead of airborne drop ,reliability is a moot point.If you can afford to shoot a gun enough to break it,you can afford a backup.
Let's take a 1911 vs Glock 21.Both handguns will easily last at minimum 5,000 rounds,and probably beyond.But let's play into the stereotype.5,000 rounds of practice .45 ACP will cost about $4500 at current prices.If one has that kind of cash,an outlay of $1500 for a backup piece is pocket money. Assuming the 1911 breaks first-ive seen Glocks fail too- the owner merely bundles up the piece and sends it back to the factory for repair,during which time the spare gun is carried.Further, let's remember that most civil defense situations are over as soon as the gun is presented to the attacker.
As such,for those of us who commute to work by car instead of airborne drop ,reliability is a moot point.If you can afford to shoot a gun enough to break it,you can afford a backup.


GLocks utilizes a modified version of the short recoil-operated locked breech also designed by JMB and first utilized on the P35 Hi-Power.
Comment