Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Glock 17 vs 34

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jakejake527
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 1078

    Glock 17 vs 34

    Purpose: Home defense and range toy. I already have a 19

    Glock 17 vs 34

    Price is neglible. I'm fine with current grip size of gen 3. Do the gen 4 grips also have the "hump" on the back strap?

    Why do you prefer one over the other?

    $500 for a former range rental glock 34 a fair price?
    129
    17
    0%
    50
    34
    0%
    79

    The poll is expired.

  • #2
    SuperSet
    Calguns Addict
    • Feb 2007
    • 9048

    Good price for that G34. Get it since you already have the G19.

    Comment

    • #3
      cindynles
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2008
      • 2806

      If you already have a 19 I would get the 34. I have a 19 and a 17 and if I had it to do over again I would have gotten the 34 instead of the 17. There is really not much difference at all between the 17 and 19.
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." B.Franklin,1759

      Comment

      • #4
        Spdjunkie
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2006
        • 1972

        imho: My favorite Glock is the G19, close second is the G17

        The Glock 19 you have is "The Do It All Glock"

        BUT, if you "need" or "want" to add another 9mm Glock for HD & Range work = "I" would say Glock 17

        The Glock 34 is nice, but really no different from the G17 for the added price difference.
        Wouldnt say one is more accurate than the other . . . Too slim of a difference, comes down to shooter.
        Price would be the main factor for me: If one comes to be cheaper than the other, I'd get the cheaper one.

        -OR-
        - Just buy more ammo, get more range time, &/or a nice set of NS, if you dont already have a set, for your Glock 19
        Last edited by Spdjunkie; 06-10-2013, 3:14 PM.

        Comment

        • #5
          Chaos47
          Calguns Addict
          • Apr 2010
          • 6615

          34 I love mine.
          Since you have a 19 the 17 will be way too similar. BTW the 34 does not weigh much more then the 17 because of the slide porting.

          Comment

          • #6
            echopapa
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 986

            Get both

            Comment

            • #7
              FourLoko
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 2426

              34 then send it to Glock for a redux

              no reason to shy away from a longer sight radius if it's just a "sit around" gun

              Comment

              • #8
                SNCaliber
                Veteran Member
                • Mar 2012
                • 3222

                get a 34! longer sight radius does wonders, I miss my G35
                -Sang

                Comment

                • #9
                  jakejake527
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 1078

                  "redux" ??? please explain

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Striker
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 750

                    Originally posted by jakejake527
                    Purpose: Home defense and range toy. I already have a 19

                    Glock 17 vs 34

                    Price is neglible. I'm fine with current grip size of gen 3. Do the gen 4 grips also have the "hump" on the back strap?

                    Why do you prefer one over the other?

                    $500 for a former range rental glock 34 a fair price?
                    Either is fine. I like the 17 and 19 quite a bit. To me, those two guns are about the right size to do anything with. 17 is a little easier to shoot and the 19 is a little more concealable. 34 is a good gun though.

                    IMO, $500.00 is too much for a former range rental Glock. Rental Glocks usually get a ton of use and I wouldn't pay that much for one.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      jeffafa
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 1068

                      I've shot the 34 and it's a nice gun without question. When comparing to the 17, I didn't feel there was enough of a difference to warrant the extra cost.
                      I'd also rethink using a former range rental for a HD gun. I rented a G17 at our local range and after 20 rounds one of the pins fell out.
                      Glockstore has Gen 3 34's new for $599, but they are likely heavily back-ordered.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        jakejake527
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 1078

                        does anyone know if the "hump" in the backstrap in the gen 3 is still on the gen 4?

                        I'm fine with the gen 3 grips, but I wish the backstrap was flat like a 1911

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Trgt
                          Member
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Jan 2013
                          • 367

                          There is also the 17c (compensated) that might be fun for range toy (you'd have to try and see if the porting made a difference for you), but maybe not so good for home defense / night shooting with the upward flash.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Lead Waster
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 16650

                            Originally posted by Striker
                            Either is fine. I like the 17 and 19 quite a bit. To me, those two guns are about the right size to do anything with. 17 is a little easier to shoot and the 19 is a little more concealable. 34 is a good gun though.

                            IMO, $500.00 is too much for a former range rental Glock. Rental Glocks usually get a ton of use and I wouldn't pay that much for one.
                            Well, I'd just consider at "pre-broken-in" Glock. Unless you see damage to the frame, most parts are cheap to replace (except the barrel and sights).

                            Any Glock worth its salt will shrug off range rental duty.
                            ==================

                            sigpic


                            Remember to dial 1 before 911.

                            Forget about stopping power. If you can't hit it, you can't stop it.

                            There. Are. Four. Lights!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Striker
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 750

                              Originally posted by Lead Waster
                              Well, I'd just consider at "pre-broken-in" Glock. Unless you see damage to the frame, most parts are cheap to replace (except the barrel and sights).

                              Any Glock worth its salt will shrug off range rental duty.
                              For $500.00? Too much for it. By the time you replace the parts, how far into it are you monetarily? A new one is $650.00, so if you have to replace the barrel, which I'm guessing you would, you're past the point of the price of a new one. And even if you don't, assuming you can do all the work yourself, how far into it are you monetarily? Even if it's just a $100.00 ($600.00 total), it's still too much. At least it is IMO. YMMV.

                              I wouldn't do it, but that's me.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1