Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Reliability observation.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    ap3572001
    Calguns Addict
    • Jun 2007
    • 6039

    My reliability obresvation in the last 27 years....

    1). Smith and Wesson , colt and ruger revolvers are STILL more reliable tha automatics.
    2). When reliability is being tested, ONLY STOCK GUNS,OEM FULL CAPACITY MAGAZINES AND QUALITY FACTORY AMMO IS USED.
    3). No OUT OF THE BOX 1911 is as reliable as modern FULL size 9mm pistols.
    4). Tricked out Glock 40 with some reloads DOES NOT SPEAK OF GLOCK REALIABILITY. NOT AT ALL.
    5). 9mm IS MORE RELIABLE IN MOST PISTOLS THAN .40 or .45

    Shooting pistols for 27 years, LEO almost 20 years, LE Range instructor for almost that long.

    PS. Glocks ARE outstanding

    Comment

    • #32
      starsnuffer
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 2212

      Handguns are not particularly complicated devices. While it's very typical for men to become over-interested in equipment for virtually any activity they partake in, in the vast majority of circumstances, the equipment is a very small variable compared to preparation, skill, and practice. Handgun shooting is no different.

      Reliability and accuracy have much more to do with the user (and maintenance performed by the user) then the gear.

      It's just much easier to talk about gear on the internet then it is about actual shooting

      -W

      Comment

      • #33
        ap3572001
        Calguns Addict
        • Jun 2007
        • 6039

        Originally posted by starsnuffer
        Handguns are not particularly complicated devices. While it's very typical for men to become over-interested in equipment for virtually any activity they partake in, in the vast majority of circumstances, the equipment is a very small variable compared to preparation, skill, and practice. Handgun shooting is no different.

        Reliability and accuracy have much more to do with the user (and maintenance performed by the user) then the gear.

        It's just much easier to talk about gear on the internet then it is about actual shooting

        -W
        +1!

        Comment

        • #34
          scarville
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          • Feb 2009
          • 2325

          Originally posted by Swoop
          Cant
          Trust any
          Gun until u have a few hundred rounds through it
          Or more. I had the mainspring tension screw on a 686 walk out almost a full turn after only about 3,000 rounds which caused light strike misfires. I put in it back in using a drop of blue loctite. OTOH, I've never noticed any difference in behavior for it or any of it's brethren in improvised positions.
          Politicians and criminals are moral twins separated only by legal fiction.

          Comment

          • #35
            sigfan91
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Jun 2009
            • 12301

            Originally posted by ChrisO
            A ideal shooting position is with the gun straight up and shooting on a square range or even off a rest. Any other position besides this is technically a improvised shooting position, Improvised shooting positions are more prone to cause failures in guns. Any gun doesn't matter how reliable or not they all act differently in different positions/situations thats why I'm saying to run the gun so you can know how gun acts.
            Is it possible for a gun that's not too reliable in ideal shooting stance, to become more reliable in improvised shooting position?

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1