Pre Ban Mags

[CALboy]

Before the ban in 2000, were there any glock30 - 25 or 30 rd mags available.

[bwiese]

This really sounds like a question designed to justify illegal acquistion of a hicap mag and I think this post should be pulled.

[HowardW56]

It does sound like that Bill....

[69Mach1]

Neither. You can use preban Glock 21 .45acp 13 round magazines. I think there were +1 or +2 base plates offered for them too.

[CALboy]

Neither. You can use preban Glock 21 .45acp 13 round magazines. I think there were +1 or +2 base plates offered for them too.

Thanks for an answer, at least someone was kind enough.

[Saigon1965]

OP - You have to understand something - The question you posted is fishing for an answer -

Glad that Mach1 was able to help you out though -

[CALboy]

Im sorry if I kept the question simple. Just needed a yes or no, didnt want to get into a whole thing. Just because I live in Ca doesnt mean I have to get treated like a criminal for asking a simple question.

[Hozr]

Just to clarify. If you had the mags preban (pre 2000) you would know the answer. The ONLY reason to ask is if you didn't know about them before the ban and therefore did not own them before the ban.

You've just provided DOJ with the evidence they need unless you have receipts from pre-ban. If I were you I would not EVER be caught with hicaps for that weapon.

Good luck though.

[Richie Caketown]

Im sorry if I kept the question simple. Just needed a yes or no, didnt want to get into a whole thing. Just because I live in Ca doesnt mean I have to get treated like a criminal for asking a simple question.

welcome to calguns , i can see where you are coming from in ur question but i can also see how some of the other guys might get upset of a question like this

[CALboy]

Just to clarify. If you had the mags preban (pre 2000) you would know the answer. The ONLY reason to ask is if you didn't know about them before the ban and therefore did not own them before the ban.

You've just provided DOJ with the evidence they need unless you have receipts from pre-ban. If I were you I would not EVER be caught with hicaps for that weapon.

Good luck though.

Did I say I have any mags? No. All I did was ask a question.
I know you treat low posters like dirt on this site, as ive seen it before on here.

[Vin496]

Did I say I have any mags? No. All I did was ask a question.
I know you treat low posters like dirt on this site, as ive seen it before on here.

Your question was a little fishy. If you look on the web you can easily find the answer.

It comes off like you were asking, if these existed before the ban, to justify having them.

[Noobert]

Did I say I have any mags? No. All I did was ask a question.
I know you treat low posters like dirt on this site, as ive seen it before on here.

Its not the low posting, its the fishiness of the question

[nativeofsandiego]

Jeeze you guys are hitting him hard. Even if he is trying to justify owning these mags, isn't he only hurting himself? If you guys answer his questions according to the law, you guys are fine. The only guy that could be hurtin' is the guy trying to acquire the +10 round magazines and IF he actually gets them, and IF he gets caught and IF they find out he was on Calguns.

[Noobert]

Its the Rules: "f)No posting information that can be construed to be illegal, firearm related or not."

[Geo]

Act like dirt, get treated like dirt.