Realistcally, all those HANDGUNS in the competition would make adequate side arms. Keep in mind the context here. This isnt a battle rifle competition. Its a sidearm that will most likely have very limited combat application.
As with any competition, there can only be one winner. Does that mean all the others were complete trash? Of course not. Its really small beans to crow about how the winner is so much more superior to any of the other designs.
How long has striker fired pistol technology been around? For decades. Its literally not rocket science.
This earth shattering "news" is much ado about nothing. If you like Sigs thats fine, if you like Glock thats fine too. Both are great guns and some of us actually like both AND 1911s in 9mm, .40, AND .45. OH MY GOD, BLASPHEMY! It really comes down to personal preference.
This thread is just another lame attempt to start a flame war. Good job OP, your troll is strong with this thread.
As with any competition, there can only be one winner. Does that mean all the others were complete trash? Of course not. Its really small beans to crow about how the winner is so much more superior to any of the other designs.
How long has striker fired pistol technology been around? For decades. Its literally not rocket science.
This earth shattering "news" is much ado about nothing. If you like Sigs thats fine, if you like Glock thats fine too. Both are great guns and some of us actually like both AND 1911s in 9mm, .40, AND .45. OH MY GOD, BLASPHEMY! It really comes down to personal preference.
This thread is just another lame attempt to start a flame war. Good job OP, your troll is strong with this thread.

Comment