Why no Canik in CA

[Prophet]

I think it has something to do with the new assault pistols ban of 2018.

[Skip_Dog]

We can not be trusted to spend our own money or own any U.S.A. legal gun here in Ca. The rulers of this once great state will make all decisions for us. Constitution be damned. They are restricting us little by little so when they do the last push all we can say is "Well at least we knew all along what they were doing".

[JS41989]

Microstamping as others have clearly mentioned

[Ej6fade]

...

[PerkOne]

This is my first comment, and after learning about microstamping I must use my first comment to say that the idea of microstamping as a way to prevent me from legally purchasing a perfectly legal handgun is the most rediculous thing I have ever heard. Shouldn't the technology at least be demonstrated as possible before making it a requirement? And what about if I just filed (?) The firing pin? Or if someone just uses someone elses reloads to kill someone? This is what is preventing me from purchasing my glock 19 gen 5....incredible...

[SkyHawk]

This is my first comment, and after learning about microstamping I must use my first comment to say that the idea of microstamping as a way to prevent me from legally purchasing a perfectly legal handgun is the most rediculous thing I have ever heard. Shouldn't the technology at least be demonstrated as possible before making it a requirement? And what about if I just filed (?) The firing pin? Or if someone just uses someone elses reloads to kill someone? This is what is preventing me from purchasing my glock 19 gen 5....incredible...

It was never about tech, it was always about infringing your 2A rights. They dress up their infringmements with safety sounding BS, 'for the children'.

If microstamping did become ubiquitous, they would find some other BS way to stop you from buying guns. Rinse. Wash. Repeat.

[tuna quesadilla]

This is my first comment, and after learning about microstamping I must use my first comment to say that the idea of microstamping as a way to prevent me from legally purchasing a perfectly legal handgun is the most rediculous thing I have ever heard. Shouldn't the technology at least be demonstrated as possible before making it a requirement? And what about if I just filed (?) The firing pin? Or if someone just uses someone elses reloads to kill someone? This is what is preventing me from purchasing my glock 19 gen 5....incredible...

This is what the Democrat party wants for you. Remember that.

[PerkOne]

It was never about tech, it was always about infringing your 2A rights. They dress up their infringmements with safety sounding BS, 'for the children'.

If microstamping did become ubiquitous, they would find some other BS way to stop you from buying guns. Rinse. Wash. Repeat.

This is a big part of why I joined CGN. To help educate myself and do my part and contribute in the fight of our 2A rights in my state.

[Nor*Cal]

This is a big part of why I joined CGN. To help educate myself and do my part and contribute in the fight of our 2A rights in my state.

Welcome to the fight. And to Calguns.

[Michael777]

You can still buy off roster guns. You will just pay a premium in the marketplace

[Full Clip]

You can still buy off roster guns. You will just pay a premium in the marketplace

Yeah, that's reasonable.
"Only $2,000 for a lightly used Hudson 9?! Deal!"

[The Shootist]

Yeah, that's reasonable.
"Only $2,000 for a lightly used Hudson 9?! Deal!"

Actually 3K lol....you gotta pay to play here in California.

[Dvrjon]

This is what the Democrat party wants for you. Remember that.

Well, let's give all the important players their due. A "Republican" governor signed it into law.

[Dvrjon]

There is a difference between BANNED and not on the roster.

A distinction without a difference.

[Donovan3]

Caniks and other handguns not on the roster are very dangerous for the general population to own. These laws are made to protect us.