hello all, Before you start flaming me, I am not a Glock fan boy but I do like them.
I was watching a video from "TheYankeemarshal" and he talks about why Glock filed a lawsuit for losing the contract to the US Army over the SIG P320. He said something that made me think about Glock. He states that Glocks are becoming irrelevant because they don't change very much, and I am starting to agree with him. Glock made little changes from generation to generations, but I do understand that they want to keep the handguns simple; but they can make changes such as putting on better sights, make a full 1913 picatinny rails, a better trigger shoe are some of the changes. I thought it was interesting.
What do you guys think?
I was watching a video from "TheYankeemarshal" and he talks about why Glock filed a lawsuit for losing the contract to the US Army over the SIG P320. He said something that made me think about Glock. He states that Glocks are becoming irrelevant because they don't change very much, and I am starting to agree with him. Glock made little changes from generation to generations, but I do understand that they want to keep the handguns simple; but they can make changes such as putting on better sights, make a full 1913 picatinny rails, a better trigger shoe are some of the changes. I thought it was interesting.
What do you guys think?


Comment