Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Is a Glock really worth more than 600 or so?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #91
    Lead Waster
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Sep 2010
    • 16650

    Join GSSF for two years, $60, get two discount coupons. You can then guy two Glocks at $425 (for 9mm ones anyway)
    ==================

    sigpic


    Remember to dial 1 before 911.

    Forget about stopping power. If you can't hit it, you can't stop it.

    There. Are. Four. Lights!

    Comment

    • #92
      DysfunctionalVet
      Banned
      • Sep 2014
      • 694

      Originally posted by Lead Waster
      Join GSSF for two years, $60, get two discount coupons. You can then guy two Glocks at $425 (for 9mm ones anyway)
      I'll stick to my blue label Glocks. The issue is finding the ones I want in stock. Everyone seems to have the .40 not 9mm

      Comment

      • #93
        Wordupmybrotha
        From anotha motha
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2013
        • 6965

        Originally posted by Lead Waster
        Join GSSF for two years, $60, get two discount coupons. You can then guy two Glocks at $425 (for 9mm ones anyway)
        Is it $30 membership fee per year and then you can buy the Glock for $425 before tax at any store?

        425 before tax
        38 tax
        30 membership
        493 total

        Good price

        Comment

        • #94
          sharkforce
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 83

          considering I paid 500 for a gen 4 but then with taxes pushing it to about 550, I can see 600$ pricing in the near future just from inflation alone.

          Comment

          • #95
            Erion929
            Veteran Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 4706

            Originally posted by sharkforce
            considering I paid 500 for a gen 4 but then with taxes pushing it to about 550, I can see 600$ pricing in the near future just from inflation alone.

            YOU are NOT in California

            Certainly valid to debate Gen 3s, but all this comparo to Gen 4 Glocks is just funny. You will wait a long time in Cali if you want one under $800...with some chance of never....unless you monitor the market 24/7. The market is at $800-900, with $1000 going to those who cannot wait to search anymore.
            Join Active Junky for online rebates....$10 to both you and me!

            https://www.activejunky.com/invite/238017


            Comment

            • #96
              Sam
              Calguns Addict
              CGN Contributor
              • Jul 2008
              • 5205

              I'd pay 600 for a Gen4 considering the scarcity in California.

              Comment

              • #97
                bigchinner
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 1740

                It's very similar to the ammo "crash". I admit paying more than 10.00/bx for 5.56 FMJ. Yes, I did and no I won't sell them for 8.00/bx. LOL.
                Most people, except professional politicians, know that making laws more strict when there are already millions of guns around doesn't make streets safer. I am not a professional lawyer, police officer, gun dealer or anything else, but every new stringent law about legally owning a gun makes more expensive guns. Tell me one thing that has come out of the last guns law that protects citizens and lessen crime? I certainly couldn't tell you. My friend just bought his first Glock last year. He has pretty much gone to it as his CCW, G19, and his first choice pistol instead of his S&W 569. Thank
                goodness he has come to the darkside.

                Comment

                • #98
                  Packy14
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 5312

                  Originally posted by DysfunctionalVet
                  Fair is subjective. As a buyer I should not have to help a seller recoup his "fees".
                  Lol and you won't have or need his gun.
                  NRA Lifetime Member

                  1A-2A = -1A

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    Packy14
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 5312

                    Originally posted by DysfunctionalVet
                    What's the difference between that and me selling what I have into mine?
                    I can take the sights and other stuff off minus the cerakote. After all that I still wouldn't try and add in my dros fees.

                    Your "fees" have no value without your gun. I can take my extras off and they hold a value on their own. Their value isn't tied into just 1 object. My "$730" Glock can go down based on items that can be removed. Those items removed can then be sold off for $xx.xx
                    I'll give you 300$ for your Glock, that's what it's worth to me..so how bout it?
                    NRA Lifetime Member

                    1A-2A = -1A

                    Comment

                    • hdpauly
                      Junior Member
                      • Aug 2015
                      • 99

                      The roster is not going anywhere, it has nothing to do with guns it has to do with California getting to charge 5,000 per model a company makes so they can sell for 1 year! Since gun companies are paying it I wouldn't be surprised if other states start making the same laws! Hate the politicians!!! Buy guns and ammo why you can still! Or take up golf.

                      Comment

                      • Echidin
                        Veteran Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 3057

                        Well worth it to me. YMMV.

                        Comment

                        • stix213
                          AKA: Joe Censored
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 18998

                          Depends on the Glock. The Glock gen4's are certainly worth more than $600 or so to enough people. I would like one for the California novelty of the gen4, but not sure I'm willing to spend $900 or whatever I last saw them for.

                          I think I paid a little over $600 when I special ordered my Glock 17C gen3 a while back. I was fine paying a little extra because the shop was going to hunt it down for me (I've never seen one in stock at any local shop).

                          Other than that for a new common gen3 I don't see how they are worth more than $600.
                          Last edited by stix213; 02-26-2016, 12:51 AM.

                          Comment

                          • Dee_Dub
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 2091

                            Originally posted by Walky Talky
                            Where you do that at?
                            blue label
                            A man's GOT to know his limitations.

                            Comment

                            • Mongoos913
                              Member
                              • Oct 2013
                              • 360

                              Every firearm in CA is over priced if you have to include; bullet button, muzzle extension, 10 round mags b/c you cant have the normal mag that comes with the firearm, SSE, SSE2, taxes, Dros fees for C&R, etc...

                              I paid more for my G19 Gen 4 but I wanted one. Some pay for hooker and others get it for free. Supply and demand....

                              Comment

                              • .45 ACP
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2014
                                • 1544

                                Glock 19s are really hard to get especially Gen 3s. Military contracts are sucking up all the supply.
                                The Second Amendment ex-tends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding. - The United States Supreme Court

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1