CA M&P Shield Mods & MagGuts Spring Test

[code_blue]

"Safe" features were added for prevention of ND i.e. for those who don't follow the cardinal rules of firearms ownership. They hold zero bearing in an SD situation. A good shoot is a good shoot. Justifiable homicide is justifiable homicide regardless of the tool utilized.

Again, this is a parts review thread; not a thread for hyperboles to be thrown around. If you wish to discuss your criminal/civil liability topic further, start your own thread. Please don't clutter mine.

[tonyxcom]

Give FO sights a try. Nothing beats them during the day and in low light, or backlit from a flashlight they will be a solid black post (the same as night sights BTW).

[code_blue]

Very nice, Tony! Dawson Precisions? Nice stipling as well, Sir. I may opt for the Trijicon HDs, but I need to get used to them on my P320 first. They're harder to be precise because of the larger dot area.

I also had no idea that the non-CA variants had that blatant warning on the side, "CAUTION-CAPABLE OF FIRING WITH MAGAZINE REMOVED". I guess they cater to stupid people outside of CA as well.

[tonyxcom]

The rear is a 10-8 and the front is Warren Tactical. Stippling by Enhanced Precision Products. The rubber Talon grips weren't grippy enough and the granulate was too abrasive on my skin. The Carry texture from EPP is perfect.

And yeah, the lawyer speak is standard on all M&P's without mag discos.

[Packy14]

Did the removal of safety features contribute to the violation of the law in a shooting?

Of course not... And the DA won't care that it didn't. I know I wouldn't wanna be a test case.

[Bainter1212]

Give FO sights a try. Nothing beats them during the day and in low light, or backlit from a flashlight they will be a solid black post (the same as night sights BTW).

Those are nice....worthy of looking into.
What price did you get them at?

[tonyxcom]

Here is my current EDC, and another example of the 10-8 rear with a Warren Tactical front with stippling by EPP.

[tonyxcom]

Those are nice....worthy of looking into.
What price did you get them at?

I think they were 40 something each end. Kinda expensive but a small batch part. FRONT URL / REAR URL

[Coachie]

Here is my current EDC, and another example of the 10-8 rear with a Warren Tactical front with stippling by EPP.

What brand holster is that, and how do you like it? I need one for my Shield, so I don't think this is OT...

[tonyxcom]

It's a Raven Concealment Phantom with Comp-Tac IWB Clips. It's not actually see through.

[code_blue]

It's a Raven Concealment Phantom with Comp-Tac IWB Clips. It's not actually see through.

[Mithrandir13]

.
.

[Mithrandir13]

the Democrats are trying to get implemented a "Safety" similar to the Mag-out-Safety that disables the trigger if the mag is removed.....

it would function as follows...
Mag Out = Trigger Disabled
Mag In & Empty Chamber = Trigger Engaged
Mag In & Loaded Chamber = Trigger Disabled

how is that for Feinsteinian Gun Safety!!!

coming soon to a Lib'tard State near you!!
.
.

(OOps.. corrected)

[code_blue]

Hmmm, not sure about ported for my personal use, but it's worth a shot.

[Cokebottle]

Hmmm, not sure about ported for my personal use, but it's worth a shot.

Agreed.
Ported is not a good idea for a carry piece.

They work great on the range.

They don't work quite so well when you are point blank on your attacker and are firing from tucked in to your strong side ribs while holding the attacker away from your gun with your weak arm.

Flash and powder blast to the face makes followup shots harder than they would be with an unported barrel.