Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonoma
Collapse
X
-
I submitted 11/27/19 so it should be coming up soon! I haven't submitted GMC letters yet I was waiting for approval.. there must be a flood of applications now we gone dark green!Comment
-
Can we really say it's dark green if articulable good cause is still required?Brian Kelly
PM me for electrical workComment
-
-
I try to advise folks to use at least minimal GC (and proof of it) in case a sheriff/chief who accepted SD = GC gets replaced, you'll be less likely to get your CCW pulled.
ETA: Hutchens, after our 3-judge win in Peruta in CA9 accepted SD = GC. Everyone celebrated and applied using SD = GC and got issued. Then we lost at CA9 en banc. IIRC, she then started requiring GC and proof of it. Everyone was panicked thinking was taking OC back to red. No, she was just taking it to the light side of Dark Green or Light Green. That's why I say why mess with SD = GC when you have and can prove you have more? Get cash at ATMs late at night and fill up your tank late at night? Use it as GC and use recepeits as proof. Are you an "avid shooter" who's a club member and takes several semiautos and several hundreds of rounds of ammo to the range every month? Prove it and use that too. As I explain in my CCW Advice thread, getting a CA CCW permit has nothing to do with the 2nd A RKBA so don't think that using only SD = GC is somehow supporting the 2nd A.Last edited by Paladin; 02-02-2020, 8:21 AM.Comment
-
If you go through my CCW Advice thread (http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s....php?t=1482924), in post #31 I explain the colors. They're really a spectrum where one color fades into the next. Dark Green has two parts: the dark side where SD = GC and a lighter side where they ask for minimal GC (basically, where you feel vulnerable, like getting cash at an ATM at night, filling up your tank at night). FWIW Dark Red has 3 sides: actual No Issue, Corrupt Issue and Virtual No Issue.
I try to advise folks to use at least minimal GC (and proof of it) in case a sheriff/chief who accepted SD = GC gets replaced, you'll be less likely to get your CCW pulled.
ETA: Hutchens, after our 3-judge win in Peruta in CA9 accepted SD = GC. Everyone celebrated and applied using SD = GC and got issued. Then we lost at CA9 en banc. IIRC, she then started requiring GC and proof of it. Everyone was panicked thinking was taking OC back to red. No, she was just taking it to the light side of Dark Green or Light Green. That's why I say why mess with SD = GC when you have and can prove you have more? Get cash at ATMs late at night and fill up your tank late at night? Use it as GC and use recepeits as proof. Are you an "avid shooter" who's a club member and takes several semiautos and several hundreds of rounds of ammo to the range every month? Prove it and use that too. As I explain in my CCW Advice thread, getting a CA CCW permit has nothing to do with the 2nd A RKBA so don't think that using only SD = GC is somehow supporting the 2nd A.
GC'd my CCW into the RKBA for an SD tank of High Test?If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you thereComment
-
FWIW, you'll have to figure out CA and ATM on your own....Comment
-
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=900368
FWIW, you'll have to figure out CA and ATM on your own....Comment
-
I was on Nov 7th, and she said I would hear by the 90 day mark... so hopefully by Friday I will know!Comment
-
Hopefully that's not the case.. I would think you would get an email of some sort if you were denied, or approved.. I'm getting close to the 90 day mark myself.. hopefully they're super busy and overwhelmed with all the applications they've received, and just running behindComment
-
Does yor status bar on the website still say"assigning to processor shortly"?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,852,815
Posts: 24,976,787
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,326
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3377 users online. 31 members and 3346 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment