Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Santa Clara

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    ColdDeadHands1
    Veteran Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 3391

    Originally posted by wildhawker
    We have good cause info in hand, but it will take a couple of weeks to redact and scan. Please stay patient - Santa Clara is on the radar.
    This is absolutely great news Brandon. Finally some visible movement on SCC! I already have my app filled out and am waiting for the word.

    Thanks again for all your hard work.


    "Let me guess... This isn't about the alcohol or tobacco?"

    Comment

    • #47
      wildhawker
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Nov 2008
      • 14150

      Originally posted by ColdDeadHands1
      This is absolutely great news Brandon. Finally some visible movement on SCC! I already have my app filled out and am waiting for the word.

      Thanks again for all your hard work.
      You might have to fill out your app again, but glad you're ready to roll.


      Originally posted by 2Cute2Shoot
      i hope more people will get ccw in Santa Clara eventually! Sheriff Laurie Smith is actually awesome and i love it that there is a female sheriff there, and actually it is not her but all the liberal people in Santa Clara that are the ones who don't want ccw. i think if things change, she would give lots of ccw's!!
      I really have to ask you what you're basing your assertions on. We have real data which shows otherwise. If you have something tangible, please PM me as I'm very curious as to what evidence you have that would suggest Sheriff Smith is even mildly pro-CCW.
      Brandon Combs

      I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

      My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

      Comment

      • #48
        tabrisnet
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 526

        Tax deductible??

        Originally posted by ColdDeadHands1
        Seriously? Not sure if you're joking or not. Sheriff Smith is absolutely anti CCW unless of course you concede to her corrupt ways. A mere $5k "campaign donation" is sure to get you a CCW in SCC. I wouldn't be surprised if she lands in jail at some point in the forseeable future.
        Is it tax deductible?
        Life SAF Member
        Life GOA Member
        EFF Member
        x7

        Comment

        • #49
          Paladin
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Dec 2005
          • 12400

          Originally posted by 2Cute2Shoot
          i hope more people will get ccw in Santa Clara eventually! Sheriff Laurie Smith is actually awesome and i love it that there is a female sheriff there, and actually it is not her but all the liberal people in Santa Clara that are the ones who don't want ccw. i think if things change, she would give lots of ccw's!!
          2C2S, if you want to help more people get CCWs, you could start by using my "business card fliers" (see my 15 things YOU CAN DO linked in my sig line), to share w/people about what CGF is trying to accomplish. Again, today, I met another total stranger (he was wearing a camo baseball hat), struck up a conversation, and 5 min later had another "convert." If you choose your "targets" its like shooting fish in a barrel. More ideas can be found here:


          Sheriff Smith can change things anytime she wants. She could start accepting self-defense for GC right now if she wanted. That way people who want a CCW could actually get one. She could even start w/baby steps like posting some -- any! -- information about CCWs on their website. But she has chosen not to.

          Unfortunately, I think you've made a different choice than Luke . . . .

          240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

          Comment

          • #50
            tabrisnet
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 526

            Originally posted by wildhawker
            You might have to fill out your app again, but glad you're ready to roll.
            The next question is, where can one go to practice the drill for qualifying... Not that the reqs are very high, but when I went to the range to test myself on the SCC Sheriff reqs, I got in trouble for firing too fast. 10 shots in 20 seconds is too fast.
            Last edited by tabrisnet; 12-09-2010, 3:03 PM. Reason: lack of spall chucking.
            Life SAF Member
            Life GOA Member
            EFF Member
            x7

            Comment

            • #51
              vladbutsky
              In Memoriam
              • Nov 2007
              • 298

              Originally posted by tabrisnet
              The next question is, where can one go to practice the drill for qualifying... Not that the reqs are very high, but when I went to the range to test myself on the SCC Sherrif reqs, I got in trouble for firing too fast. 10 shots in 20 seconds is too fast.
              Metcalf range. Every 1st and 3rd Sunday from 10am to 4pm at 75yard range.
              PM me if you want more details.
              Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
              Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

              Comment

              • #52
                tabrisnet
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 526

                Originally posted by ColdDeadHands1
                Seriously? Not sure if you're joking or not. Sheriff Smith is absolutely anti CCW unless of course you concede to her corrupt ways. A mere $5k "campaign donation" is sure to get you a CCW in SCC. I wouldn't be surprised if she lands in jail at some point in the forseeable future.
                If it were to be found to be illegal for her to require a donation/bribe, would that not also produce charges for those who donated in order to get a CCW?
                Life SAF Member
                Life GOA Member
                EFF Member
                x7

                Comment

                • #53
                  BanjoGunner
                  Member
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 357

                  Volunteered and sponsored.
                  "Truth is our most valuable commodity - let us economize." -- Mark Twain

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    Gray Peterson
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 5817

                    Originally posted by tabrisnet
                    If it were to be found to be illegal for her to require a donation/bribe, would that not also produce charges for those who donated in order to get a CCW?
                    Yep.

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      ColdDeadHands1
                      Veteran Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 3391

                      Originally posted by wildhawker
                      We have good cause info in hand, but it will take a couple of weeks to redact and scan. Please stay patient - Santa Clara is on the radar.
                      Looking forward to the GC statements. Hope all is proceeding well with the redaction effort.

                      You guys are probably seeing a lot of this:

                      "I live in Saratoga and am afraid of people from San Jose coming into my neighborhood. Laurie should have received my $5,000 donation by now."


                      "Let me guess... This isn't about the alcohol or tobacco?"

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        ColdDeadHands1
                        Veteran Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 3391

                        Bumpin up the stale Santa Clara thread! Anything new out there on the GC Statements?

                        Along those lines, once they are released, then what? Do we find one that fits our situation and apply?


                        "Let me guess... This isn't about the alcohol or tobacco?"

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          Flopper
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 1280

                          Originally posted by 2Cute2Shoot
                          i hope more people will get ccw in Santa Clara eventually! Sheriff Laurie Smith is actually awesome and i love it that there is a female sheriff there, and actually it is not her but all the liberal people in Santa Clara that are the ones who don't want ccw. i think if things change, she would give lots of ccw's!!
                          You should change your name to "Miss Information."
                          Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound. -- L. Neil Smith

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            Gray Peterson
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Jan 2005
                            • 5817

                            Originally posted by Flopper
                            You should change your name to "Miss Information."
                            No sheriff has been defeated over the sole issue of CCW ever in the state's history. Ever. The sheriff herself has the authority to issue licenses.

                            2Cute2Shoot, if you know Laurie Smith personally, please advise her that the County Board of Supervisors has no authority to restrict her issuance of licenses, and her next election is 2014 and she will not be defeated over the issue of CCW. Sheriff Hennessey in San Francisco can more freely issue licenses and he still wouldn't be defeated for election. No one cares except for us and the Brady campaign crazies.

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              yellowfin
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 8371

                              Originally posted by Gray Peterson
                              her next election is 2014 and she will not be defeated over the issue of CCW.
                              Of course that's the entire problem. She and the whole lot of them should have been thrown out over the issue LONG ago.
                              No one cares except for us and the Brady campaign crazies.
                              They sure do seem to disproportionately affect things given that it's only a tiny number of them.
                              Last edited by yellowfin; 12-30-2010, 4:39 PM.
                              "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
                              Originally posted by indiandave
                              In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
                              Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                kcbrown
                                Calguns Addict
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 9097

                                Originally posted by yellowfin
                                Of course that's the entire problem. She and the whole lot of them should have been thrown out over the issue LONG ago.They sure do seem to disproportionately affect things given that it's only a tiny number of them.
                                It's not their numbers, it's their power. People in High Places want to reserve RKBA strictly for themselves so they'll have a greater power advantage over us "little people". They probably think that by doing things that way, they reduce the risk to themselves. It's another variation of the "outlaw all guns and there won't be any more gun crimes" argument.
                                The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

                                The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1