AR15 Pistol and LEO exemption question

[kemasa]

Could be both. I went to a BATF seminar for FFLs and some of the questions/comments were interesting and of a concern since it was clear that some did not have a clue.

[roushstage2]

Gotchya. I'm going to check with my local shop tomorrow and hopefully they can help out. Only $10 more for the transfer, but it'd save me an hour and a half of driving round-trip, twice. Just in case, is there somewhere that states the whole DROSing a lower as a pistol rather clearly that I could show them?

[Daydrmr999]

Gotchya. I'm going to check with my local shop tomorrow and hopefully they can help out. Only $10 more for the transfer, but it'd save me an hour and a half of driving round-trip, twice. Just in case, is there somewhere that states the whole DROSing a lower as a pistol rather clearly that I could show them?

I think there's some confusion here. Roushstage, are you a LEO? I saw you said "proper ID" , but don't want to assume you are an LEO. Your ffl is wrong about the life of a lower, but unless you are LEO you can still not dros a lower as a pistol lower.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

[roushstage2]

AR15 Pistol and LEO exemption question

I am. Just started this career last year on the 23rd of this month! Time is flying!

[CifaldiPrecision]

[QUOTE=RickD427;11791802



An LEO may still be able to register an Assault Weapon with the DOJ, making an AW build a possibility. The Attorney General has issued an opinion that such registered weapons must be surrendered upon retirement or end-of-employment. These late registrations require the endorsement of the LEOs agency and those agency policies vary widely (mine will not provide the authorization).[/QUOTE]


I wonder how LEOSA would play into this. Granted there is no ca case law nor does anyone want to be that guy. But in reality LEOSA could even be used for the duty rifle so the department didn't need to issue agency letterhead letters.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk