Now that is funny. For all the times it was said that something is questionable, at best (often actually illegal), but it is suggested that it can still be done and then in this case where it is clearly legal, refusing to do it.
For the most part it is a waste of money to DROS a named lower, but if the customer does not plan on making a semi-auto out of it, then it is not an issue, other than documenting that to CYA.
You should say a semi-auto upper on it since a non-semi-auto upper would be fine.
For the most part it is a waste of money to DROS a named lower, but if the customer does not plan on making a semi-auto out of it, then it is not an issue, other than documenting that to CYA.
Further, did your friend really plan on just leaving it unbuilt forever and never putting an upper on it? If so, then he would be fine. If not, he was planning on committing and possessing a felony.

Comment