Got a call from DOJ today...

[Santa Cruz Armory]

I'm curious why would you state that? Some single shots might be a grey area to some but, obviously the original purpose of the SS exemption is not a grey area. I would hate to have a FFL tell me that DROSing a Contender or XP100 is a "grey area".

Sorry. SHE stated it was a grey area. I don't offer any extra info.

[TripleT]

By the DOJ asking about the firearm, it sounds like they were trying to get around the 1 in 30 violation and actually attempting to do the FFL and buyer a favor by not having to re-dros.

The buyer needs to pay for another dros, to be completed thirty days after his last handgun dros and all should be well.

[TRICKSTER]

By the DOJ asking about the firearm, it sounds like they were trying to get around the 1 in 30 violation and actually attempting to do the FFL and buyer a favor by not having to re-dros.

The buyer needs to pay for another dros, to be completed thirty days after his last handgun dros and all should be well.

+1. Surprisingly, it sounds like they are looking for a reason to let it go through. In the first post it sounded like they were looking for the C&R+COE exemption. That's why I guessed that it was a 1 in 30 violation.