Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odd question for you guys
Collapse
X
-
__________________
"Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin -
If it is a hunk of metal when I receive it, I'm not going to enter it into my A/D book, I'm not going to fill out a 4473 when I sell it because it is only a "hunk of metal" and a 4473 is not required for hunks of metal. But you are saying CA says I need to DROS a hunk of metal??If you are talking about sales by people who are not California licensed dealers then anything defined as an "antique" by the feds is exempt. It doesn't matter if they are handguns and it doesn't matter if they fire modern ammo. The feds exempt all antiques from having to be transfered through an FFL and California exempts all antiques from having to be transfered through a California licensed dealer.
If you are talking about sales by California licensed dealers then where are you seeing this exemption to the DROS for any kind of antique? The penal code requires California licensed dealers to DROS any firearms they transfer to non-licensees.
I would think the "exemption" to the DROS is that it is NOT a firearm by law; hence, doesn't need to be DROSed. It is only a hunk of metal.Jim
sigpicComment
-
See my response to your question up above in post #14.If it is a hunk of metal when I receive it, I'm not going to enter it into my A/D book, I'm not going to fill out a 4473 when I sell it because it is only a "hunk of metal" and a 4473 is not required for hunks of metal. But you are saying CA says I need to DROS a hunk of metal??
I would think the "exemption" to the DROS is that it is NOT a firearm by law; hence, doesn't need to be DROSed. It is only a hunk of metal.__________________
"Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack AustinComment
-
I guess I'm dense. Where does CA PC turn them back into "firearms"...
But California law implies that if you are already licensed to sell firearms then you have to DROS them.and "imply" that I need to DROS them?
ThanksLast edited by halifax; 01-30-2012, 8:41 AM.Jim
sigpicComment
-
There are three different definitions of what an antique firearm is in the CA PC, so it is confusing and the CA DOJ seems to think that there is only one. One aspect is if there is any modern ammo which is available for it.
I have looked into this and to be quite honest I am not sure of what the answer really is, especially with the changes to the PC sections.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
See also the wiki -- http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/De..._a_firearm/gunARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
Part of the problem is not only figuring out what the correct definition for each PC section, but that the CA DOJ seems to have a different view than the actual law, which means that you might win in the end, but suffer until then.
Also, if a FFL sends you an antique firearm AND also includes a CFLC letter, then what? You can't cancel a CFLC letter and you need to be able to show what happened to the firearm.Kemasa.
False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.
Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. HeinleinComment
-
OK, thanks but it's going to take me awhile to digest that especially with the new numbering.See also the wiki -- http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/De..._a_firearm/gunJim
sigpicComment
-
It's all clear as mud now.
To DROS or not to DROS, where art thou Kamila Harris?Greg David
Eddy's Shooting Sports
(650)969-GUNS
400 Moffett Blvd., Suite F
Mountain View, CA 94043
www.eddysguns.com
Tue-Fri 12-7, Sat 11-5Comment
-
Ok I know this is an old thread but it applies to me currently
I just sent the info to my FFL
He called the DOJ about an antique that I wanted to buy
They quoted the "modern ammo " to whitch I disagreed with
After some research this is what I found
Penal code 16170 has 3 sections
(a) applies to 30515 and 30530 (assault weapons and .50 BMG)
(b)applies to 16520, Section 16650, subdivision (a) of
Section 23630, paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 27505, and
subdivision (a) of Section 31615, ---Same as federal definition of antique that only says that replica's cannot accept modern ammo (section 921) ( There is an "or Between a & b)
(c) cannot use modern ammo ONLY aplies to section 17700 - exemption to 16590 Gemerally prohibited weapons
( basically I can only buy a cane gun if it is older than 1899 AND uses obsolete ammo)
Thought I would share thisLast edited by animal661; 10-16-2012, 10:54 PM.Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
- Benjamin FranklinComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,305
Posts: 25,146,614
Members: 358,387
Active Members: 5,498
Welcome to our newest member, LakeLife.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 32507 users online. 145 members and 32362 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment