Multi-Longgun Reporting

[islandviewent]

Just got word from my buddy in Tx that he received registered mail from ATF containing the notice that it is now a requirement.

[TripleT]

Got mine today via certified mail. I wonder if USPS gives them a break ?

Letter and a new form 3310.12 "Report of Multiple Sale or Other Disposition of Certain Rifles"

[tenpercentfirearms]

I got mine yesterday. I scanned them, but have not had time to post them yet. I will do so today.

[f-ponce]

Got it today at Ammo Bros Cerritos.

[T&A Armory]

got mine today

[Falstaff]

Letter posted here: http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-at...h-home-visits/

There is no law, they tried to codify this into law but CONgress removed the long gun tracking requirement from the bill: http://www.guns.com/gun-control-advo...e-funding.html

Apparently they don't need no stinking laws; they're gonna do it anyway for long guns AND handguns. Reports out of Texas indicate that ATF agents are visiting buyers of multiple long gun purchases at home...

[ke6guj]

I got mine yesterday. I scanned them, but have not had time to post them yet. I will do so today.

ATF is hosting that file online, http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-3310-12.pdf .

I note that it only applies to "semi-automatic rifles larger than .22 caliber (including .223/5.56 caliber) with the ability to accept a detachable magazine." IIRC, there is already an ATF letter that states that a rifle with a magazine lock like a Bullet Button does not have a detachable magazine. So, it would appear that only featureless rifles would fall under that reporting requirement

and that sentence is hard to understand, are they saying that .223/2.5.56 caliber rifles are included in the .22 caliber (and smaller) rifles that are not required to be reported, or are they saying that they have to be reported?

[ParallaxTactical.com]

PAGE 1: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26450145/201..._11_35_000.pdf
PAGE 2: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26450145/201...9_15_11_35.pdf

[tenpercentfirearms]

I just got this from the NSSF.

lkeane@nssf.org

Sincerely,



Lawrence G. Keane
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
National Shooting Sports Foundation

I just e-mailed Larry Keane and told him I want to be part of the lawsuit.

[LG FIREARMS]

Got ours today too.

[ripro75]

Just got mine today as well

[IntoForever]

ATF is hosting that file online, http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-3310-12.pdf .

I note that it only applies to "semi-automatic rifles larger than .22 caliber (including .223/5.56 caliber) with the ability to accept a detachable magazine." IIRC, there is already an ATF letter that states that a rifle with a magazine lock like a Bullet Button does not have a detachable magazine. So, it would appear that only featureless rifles would fall under that reporting requirement

and that sentence is hard to understand, are they saying that .223/2.5.56 caliber rifles are included in the .22 caliber (and smaller) rifles that are not required to be reported, or are they saying that they have to be reported?

A dealer informed me the attempt indicates it is for any semi-automatic rifle and if they sell a stripped lower they will not report it because the stripped lower, at the time of sale, is of an unknown caliber (could be for a .22) and in it's current condition is not a semi-automatic.

[tenpercentfirearms]

A dealer informed me the attempt indicates it is for any semi-automatic rifle and if they sell a stripped lower they will not report it because the stripped lower, at the time of sale, is of an unknown caliber (could be for a .22) and in it's current condition is not a semi-automatic.

That is 100% correct. Anything that is not a semi-automatic, then it doesn't have to reported. Receivers are not semi-automatic, so what caliber they are or could be means nothing.

Now the question is what is a detachable magazine and more importantly what is "greater than .22". My definition of great than .22 is .23 and so .223 would not count, despite their little attemp with the parenthesis. If they want to be more specific, they need to state .220, but that brings .22 LR into the fold.

The ATF has issues.

[ke6guj]

That is 100% correct. Anything that is not a semi-automatic, then it doesn't have to reported. Receivers are not semi-automatic, so what caliber they are or could be means nothing.

yup, and they aren't even rifles. ATF said so when they ruled that 18-year olds couldn't buy stripped receivers.

Now the question is what is a detachable magazine

here is the letter I was talking about the ATF saying that Bullet Button equiped rifles didn't have detachable magazines.

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=383250&highlight=detachable

[tenpercentfirearms]

here is the letter I was talking about the ATF saying that Bullet Button equiped rifles didn't have detachable magazines.

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...ght=detachable

I like it!