FFL "limbo"

[ke6guj]

in my reading of the PC, I don't see where an FFL bringing in a firearm that he acquired out-of-sate needs to comply with 12072(f)(1).

I'll do a little trimming of the PC to show how I read it.

a person who is licensed pursuant to Chapter 44 may not deliver, sell, or transfer a firearm to a person in California who is licensed pursuant to Chapter 44 unless, prior to delivery, the person intending to deliver, sell, or transfer the firearm obtains a verification number via the Internet for the intended delivery, sale, or transfer, from the department.

I see that as two separate people described there. How can the CA FFL be transfering a firearm to himself? but in the end, until an FFL wants to push it with CADOJ, it only matters what CADOJ says, and apparantly, they say you need to have the selling FFL do a CFLC, even when the entire transaction happens outside of CA.

[EBR Works]

I cannot wait to move to Arizona....

[kemasa]

It does not say that it is two separate people and according to the CA DOJ (when I talked to them), they consider a CA FFL to be a person in California who is licensed even when the person is not in CA as they are licensed in CA.

Yeah, that is how they look at it, but it is not all outside of CA because you have to come back into CA. I have to wonder what the requirements would be if you went to someplace like AZ and bought a firearm, then went to NV and happen to sell it. That would be completely outside of CA, although the boundbook would not show that.