DOJ Large Cap Mag Permit

[NDFMF]

Hey guys,

I was just wondering what your experiences have been with the response time on the DOJ Large Cap Mag Permit. I sent in my request a couple weeks ago and still haven't heard anything. Everything else they have been pretty fast about. I sent in a request for some HSC cards at the same time and I received those back in the mail over a week ago. Anybody have any idea what might be taking them so long?

-Ehren

[POLICESTATE]

You mean standard capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law?

[CSACANNONEER]

You mean standard capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law?

No, he means "high capacity magazines" per their legal definition. I am unaware of a California "capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law" magazine permit. Is there one or are you just making stuff up?

[POLICESTATE]

No, he means "high capacity magazines" per their legal definition. I am unaware of a California "capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law" magazine permit. Is there one or are you just making stuff up?

I disagree, even if they make a law that says that water is dry doesn't make it so.

The standard capacity magazine for a Sig P228 holds 13 rounds. Anything less than that would be non-standard. Anything over that, would be a high-cap.

Whenever I see something like this I try to correct people's thinking, which is what the state is doing, they're trying to "correct" your thinking that any magazine over 10 rounds is a high-cap, and that is BS.

However we all know that when dealing with government officials we have to use their terms, but amongst ourselves...

Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4.

[NDFMF]

You mean standard capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law?

Yes, that is what I mean, but as CSACANNONEER also pointed out, I am using the letter of the law. I guess we can all probably agree that we're all hoping for the day that we get our constitutionally protected rights back. All of them.



Anyway, any ideas about why it's taking so long? Is this normal for a hi-cap mag permit application?

[CSACANNONEER]

I disagree, even if they make a law that says that water is dry doesn't make it so.

The standard capacity magazine for a Sig P228 holds 13 rounds. Anything less than that would be non-standard. Anything over that, would be a high-cap.

Whenever I see something like this I try to correct people's thinking, which is what the state is doing, they're trying to "correct" your thinking that any magazine over 10 rounds is a high-cap, and that is BS.

Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4.

The letter of the law is pretty clear here. You can disagree all you want but, that does not make any difference. Sometimes we have to take the bad with the good. Remember, the letter of the law allows us to have "attachable" magazines on our non-AW weapons.

Of course, I agree with your definition but, it is not the legal definition.

[jtmkinsd]

The standard capacity magazine for a Sig P228 holds 13 rounds. Anything less than that would be non-standard. Anything over that, would be a high-cap.

Whenever I see something like this I try to correct people's thinking, which is what the state is doing, they're trying to "correct" your thinking that any magazine over 10 rounds is a high-cap, and that is BS.

Unfortunately, in our business, the only "thinking" that counts is what the legislature puts into law. Anything over 10 rounds in CA is "high-capacity" and that's all there is to it.

[wellerjohn]

I disagree, even if they make a law that says that water is dry doesn't make it so.

The standard capacity magazine for a Sig P228 holds 13 rounds. Anything less than that would be non-standard. Anything over that, would be a high-cap.

Whenever I see something like this I try to correct people's thinking, which is what the state is doing, they're trying to "correct" your thinking that any magazine over 10 rounds is a high-cap, and that is BS.

However we all know that when dealing with government officials we have to use their terms, but amongst ourselves...

Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4.

Sir you are right on the money!

[robairto]

I just fell asleep reading this.

[socal-shooter]

i had no idea there was such a permit...

is this something that owners of pre-ban standard mags should
look into?

[Librarian]

i had no idea there was such a permit...

is this something that owners of pre-ban standard mags should
look into?

No. It's a special license for FFLs to be able to sell them.

[socal-shooter]

oh, thanks librarian

[tenpercentfirearms]

You are all wrong. I have one. It says, "Large Capacity Magazine Permit".

I get mine when I re-up my CFD and they always come in together.

[JeffM]

You mean standard capacity magazines that exceed the round limit imposed by law?

You are all wrong. I have one. It says, "Large Capacity Magazine Permit".

I was thinking the same thing reading this. Legally it's "Large Capacity"

[JeffM]

...Whenever I see something like this I try to correct people's thinking...

Lol'd hard at this by the way. Very arrogant.