The DOJ stopped by for an audit today and....

[JeffM]

There's no way the guy would know that you added long guns to a pistol DROS or extra long guns to a long gun DROS unless he cross checked the DROS's with the 4473's (or the bound book, which would be more work for him) . . . did he do that?

What if an FFL were to keep the DROSs and 4473's completely separate? The DOJ has no reason to see the 4473's as they are federal documents.

Oh and:

12071(b) A license is subject to forfeiture for a breach of any of the following prohibitions and requirements:
(4) No pistol, revolver, or other firearm or imitation thereof capable of being concealed upon the person, or placard advertising the sale or other transfer thereof, shall be displayed in any part of the premises where it can readily be seen from the outside.

Just noticed the above in bold. It doesn't say anything about a sign outside the premise.

[yzErnie]

Wes,
Getting back to the OP of him asking for the specific DROS...since the CFLC authorization letters do not have any serial numbers on them, I wonder how and why he asked for that specific one?

[tenpercentfirearms]

Wes,
Getting back to the OP of him asking for the specific DROS...since the CFLC authorization letters do not have any serial numbers on them, I wonder how and why he asked for that specific one?

Yzernie, it seems you missed this thread and this line, "Well except that didn't actually happen." However, after re-reading you might have thought I just didn't crap my pants. Well actually, he didn't ask for the number. It would seem the DOJ does not troll the FFL forum looking for things to do. Or possibly they do and they realize there is nothing they can do about adding long guns to a DROS or piggy backing long guns on a handgun DROS and 4473.

[yzErnie]

My bad, sorry.

[evanp]

Maybe eventually the DOJ. For now me.

Only a fool would dros a handgun before having it in hand. I would have thought a dealer such as yourself would use more common sense. Looking at PC Code is no excuse. Then again this is CalGuns.

[evanp]

You know what, im not an 01, so I really shouldnt be commenting here, but just bending over and being happy to take anything really is beyond me. This is how injustice is served, without a fight. Im glad it was not worse, and hope you can dispute what happened wrongly, and hopefully bring that to their attention so they dont go around making up laws again. I mean comon, does no one else think its rediculous government entities go around and make up their own rules as they go and then fail know the laws on the books?

You are not an 01 ffl so you know not of what you speek.

[ke6guj]

Only a fool would dros a handgun before having it in hand. I would have thought a dealer such as yourself would use more common sense. Looking at PC Code is no excuse. Then again this is CalGuns.

what would be the harm in DROSing a handgun that you don't physically have in hand? As long as you have the pertinant info, you should be able to start the DROS. If there was a problem, you could either amend the DROS, or cancell it, as needed.

Turners does this all the time when they have a sale. They don't have enough firearms at the store and often sell handguns that are at the warehouse. Those handguns aren't "on hand" and are probably not even on the books of that Turners. Each Turner's location has its own FFL.

[halifax]

Only a fool would dros a handgun before having it in hand. I would have thought a dealer such as yourself would use more common sense. Looking at PC Code is no excuse. Then again this is CalGuns.

I don't get it? Why is it so foolish?

ETA: OK, this was kind of joke?

[FastFinger]

So the DOJ

He inspected all of my firearms...

Honestly, over all I really liked this auditor...

Overall I gained a little respect for the DOJ today.

Geez, get a room you two.