DROS delay

[SR514]

day 27 and still delayed...

Holy crap, that has to be the record so far.

[4P0X1]

Holy crap, that has to be the record so far.

DOJ agents taking their sweet *** time on mines. It was switched over to delayed on day 14, I'm pretty sure it was flagged because of my PPT from 2 weeks prior to this new purchase.

[GeeBee49]

They're taking their time because they can. They're using the mass panic buying as an excuse even though that ended with the lockdown. All they had to do was post a notice on their website (which they did) and now they can drag this out as long as they want.
The fact is, their number one priority is gun control. They don't care about the homeless, they don't care about illegals and they don't care about releasing criminals. They only care about banning guns.
Stopping Trump is not even as much of a priority because they know that CA's electoral votes will go to the Democrats as usual.

[EL GRIEGO]

2 weeks ago, I had 2 of 3 of my DROS complete in 13 days. The 3rd is now at 27 days.

Since then I have done another two and both are at 17 days.

My FFL's understanding is if it hits Day 30 without the DROS having a decision, the law states that he is to release the firearms.

Also, it is not effecting everyone. FFL says lots are having long waits (has one at 29 days) but others are only going the 10 days. He thinks it is just dependent on who it gets assigned to at DOJ.

All 3 cleared today... 2 @ day 18 and 1 @ day 28.

[4P0X1]

They're taking their time because they can. They're using the mass panic buying as an excuse even though that ended with the lockdown. All they had to do was post a notice on their website (which they did) and now they can drag this out as long as they want.
The fact is, their number one priority is gun control. They don't care about the homeless, they don't care about illegals and they don't care about releasing criminals. They only care about banning guns.
Stopping Trump is not even as much of a priority because they know that CA's electoral votes will go to the Democrats as usual.

I'm about fed up with this damn state. Need to start looking at Arizona or Texas.

[EL GRIEGO]

They're taking their time because they can. They're using the mass panic buying as an excuse even though that ended with the lockdown. All they had to do was post a notice on their website (which they did) and now they can drag this out as long as they want.
The fact is, their number one priority is gun control. They don't care about the homeless, they don't care about illegals and they don't care about releasing criminals. They only care about banning guns.
Stopping Trump is not even as much of a priority because they know that CA's electoral votes will go to the Democrats as usual.

Then the problem is multiplied because Trump appointed an anti-gunner (the majority of senate republicans voted against him) to the 9th appeals. He is the one that issued the emergency stay on Benetiz's injunction to "keep bad people from getting ammo" like they weren't getting ammo before.

[devareaux87]

I'm from the South Bay. I'm on 'Pending' status, it is day 14 so far. My LGS sounded pretty upset when I called him to check on my status. I'm guessing he has a lot of customers that are being held up.

[SkyHawk]

Then the problem is multiplied because Trump appointed an anti-gunner (the majority of senate republicans voted against him) to the 9th appeals. He is the one that issued the emergency stay on Benetiz's injunction to "keep bad people from getting ammo" like they weren't getting ammo before.

Emergency stay has not been issued. Administrative stay has been issued. Stay tuned....

[jamesob]

I’m on day 19 right now. The 10 day “cooling off” is starting to piss me the **** off. ��

[GeeBee49]

Then the problem is multiplied because Trump appointed an anti-gunner (the majority of senate republicans voted against him) to the 9th appeals. He is the one that issued the emergency stay on Benetiz's injunction to "keep bad people from getting ammo" like they weren't getting ammo before.

Who is the judge you're referring to?

As of April 25, 2020, the United States Senate has confirmed 193 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 51 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 138 judges for the United States District Courts, and 2 judges for the United States Court of International Trade.

[Federalist50]

Who is the judge you're referring to?

As of April 25, 2020, the United States Senate has confirmed 193 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 51 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 138 judges for the United States District Courts, and 2 judges for the United States Court of International Trade.

Judge Mark J. Bennett.

[GeeBee49]

Then the problem is multiplied because Trump appointed an anti-gunner (the majority of senate republicans voted against him) to the 9th appeals. He is the one that issued the emergency stay on Benetiz's injunction to "keep bad people from getting ammo" like they weren't getting ammo before.

You are right about the judge you mentioned but my post had nothing to do with judges. It was about the DOJ taking their time approving gun purchases.

Out of 193 judges confirmed I can't expect all of them to be supportive of what's important to me. Trump may have nominated Bennett for other reasons besides gun issues, I don't know.

[????? ????]

Who is the judge you're referring to?

I assume this is a reference to Judge Bennett, who was one of the two judges on the initial emergency stay of Judge Benitez's order, but there was a later stay that was a 2-1 decision, with the Trump appointee being the dissent.