Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPT of off roster handguns
Collapse
X
-
Any gun owner who does not support the NRA is a freeloader.
-
In addition to "adding" specifically named peace officer positions to the exempt list, CA AB 2165 amends the ability of the FFL to conduct the transfer of an off-roster item to a non-exempt person if said off-roster item was acquired using the newly created method. I imagine this will be processed in a system like Kemasa alludes to.
That is to say, if one works for ABC or Probation or any of those other "new" listings, they can still transfer off-roster items that may have been received outside of the process (intra-familial transfer, gift from out of state, PPT, etc) that AB 2165 created.
Note: The Op-Law form is not a transfer through an FFL (as the newly defined PC restricts) however the CA DOJ may backdoor by just not accepting the Op-Law report. Otherwise, a mother/father DMV investigator should be able to Op-Law an off roster to their child, for example.Hauoli Makahiki Hou



-------Comment
-
Read the law more carefully -Anyone remember MEGO? - My Eyes Glaze Over.(c) (1) Notwithstanding Section 26825,
a person licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, shall not process the sale or transfer of an unsafe handgun
between a person who has obtained an unsafe handgun pursuant to an exemption specified in paragraph (6) of subdivision (b)
and a person who is not exempt from the requirements of this section.
We really have to practice overcoming that when reading statutes; I know it's difficult.
ETA - yes, of course the law makes no sense as a gun law, but that's the general analysis of all CA gun-related laws.Last edited by Librarian; 12-03-2016, 3:34 PM.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
-
Can a cop sell me an off-roster handgun after 2017? I am not exempt.Comment
-
Comment
-
Okay....
And...32000.
A "normal" sworn police officer that has always been exempt from the roster may still PPT an off-roster handgun to a non-exempt person.(c) (1) Notwithstanding Section 26825, a person licensed pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, shall not process the sale or transfer of an unsafe handgun between a person who has obtained an unsafe handgun pursuant to an exemption specified in paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) and a person who is not exempt from the requirements of this section.
The only restriction is against those listed under 3200(b)(6)(A) through 3200(b)(6)(S)- Rich

Originally posted by dantoddA just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.Comment
-
Thank you for breaking it down into the "simple" English for me, and apologies again to those who were losing patience with guys like me who weren't getting it.
Coincidentally, I saw my LEO friend today (who had thought he could not do PPT with me after Jan. 1). He told me the same thing. Phew! No law-away before the holidays. What a (financial) relief!Comment
-
Those listed under 3200(b)(6)(a) through 3200(b) were able to purchase off roster for years until the DOJ sent out the memo last year. Profoce WAS selling off roster handgun to anyone as long as you have the word "peace officer" on your ID. What about those off roster handgun purchases prior to the DOJ sent out the memo?Any gun owner who does not support the NRA is a freeloader.
Comment
-
Bingo - DOJ "regulating" on what they see fit...Those listed under 3200(b)(6)(a) through 3200(b) were able to purchase off roster for years until the DOJ sent out the memo last year. Profoce WAS selling off roster handgun to anyone as long as you have the word "peace officer" on your ID. What about those off roster handgun purchases prior to the DOJ sent out the memo?
The short answer: those purchases were not processed via the exemption outlined ("created") in AB 2165, they were processed via the traditional method and should still be able to be PPT'd away.Hauoli Makahiki Hou



-------Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,860,678
Posts: 25,071,803
Members: 355,125
Active Members: 5,664
Welcome to our newest member, GJag.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5518 users online. 89 members and 5429 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.


Comment