Delete

[czakita]

Delete

[mossy]

No.

[Barang]

no but it is coming. 666 will require you take the mark so that you can buy or sell. what we have at the present is a preparation and conditioning people for the coming of the beast.

[Dano3467]

precursor.

must ease the sheep into taking the mark

[GlockN'Roll]

Do you believe the jab is the Mark of the Beast (MOB)? Kindly share why.

Attached is a document our small fellowship created discussing the MOB.

Kindly review and share your thoughts. Stay safe and God Bless.

As others have suggested, requiring proof of vaccination documentation is merely the first step to a universal government approved marking...

[Barang]

also, if you believe in rapture, the mark is not forced until King Jesus reappear to take us with Him to heaven.

[anthonyca]

[Grouchy Bear]

[unclerandy]

Do you believe the jab is the Mark of the Beast (MOB)? Kindly share why.

Attached is a document our small fellowship created discussing the MOB.

Kindly review and share your thoughts. Stay safe and God Bless.

The mark of the beast is not symbolism or something that can be mistaken. The mark of the beast will literally be a mark of 666. So no!

[Grouchy Bear]

The mark of the beast is not symbolism or something that can be mistaken. The mark of the beast will literally be a mark of 666. So no!

[dk94044]

no because Amazon says so

[rp55]

Let's take a look at what Revelation says (all quotes English Standard Version).
Highlights are mine:

Rev 13:16
"Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the foreheada mark on his forehead or on his hand,"

Rev 20:4
"Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed. Also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years."

Not defending the vaccinations at all but it is clear that a "jab on the shoulder" has no connection whatsoever to a "mark on the forehead or the hands". Therefore, not the mark of the beast.

[RAMCLAP]

Throughout the empire, many city-states practiced emperor worship in order to receive the best treatment from Rome. In order to enter the agoura to buy, sell, and trade one had to offer a sacrifice at the altar of Nero. Then the priest would wipe ash from the sacrifice on the hand or forehead of the worshipper. Then they could enter. The Mark of the Beast (Nero) happened a long time ago.

[layshotcharley]

[Garand Hunter]

In a single word: NO. Why not ? Its not a MARK on the hand or forehead. Snuff said. Why not ? Simple, its NOT a precondition for buying and selling within the boundaries of the old Roman Empire. Also, Worship directed to " The Beast " IS NOT connected to the injection of the vaccine.

Psalm 1