Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Assault Weapons for personal use by LEOs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Notorious
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 4695

    Originally posted by manuelcardenas77
    So what does SCAR stand for? For those who say the "AW" is fabricated by the media....
    Marketing. The real SCAR has about as much to do with the civilian SCAR as your Chevrolet Camaro have to do with the NASCAR Camaro.
    I like guns

    Comment

    • #17
      lavey29
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 1126

      Originally posted by TRICKSTER
      LEOs are exempt from 10+ magazine law, they can purchase "hi-cap magazines" any time they want. They are not exempt from Assault Weapon laws and can only purchase and register a Assault Weapon if authorized by their department.

      Correct and not all Departments will give you an authorization to purchase. Also, if you leave employment DOJ requires the rifle be turned in once peace officer status is no longer in affect. Not sure if they allow conversion to legal rifle such as BB installed in lieu of. Probably depends on the on/off list.

      Comment

      • #18
        Notorious
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 4695

        Originally posted by lavey29
        Correct and not all Departments will give you an authorization to purchase. Also, if you leave employment DOJ requires the rifle be turned in once peace officer status is no longer in affect. Not sure if they allow conversion to legal rifle such as BB installed in lieu of. Probably depends on the on/off list.
        Did DOJ put out a new memo requiring that upon separation of employment?

        AFAIK, there is no mechanism for turning in your personally purchased AW nor was there anything written in the law about conversion to legal configuration.

        The parting shot by Moonbeam Brown was just his opinion as AG and given his background, it's no surprise that he wrote that to pass onto Kamala to carry out his wishes to disarm the populace.

        Until told otherwise, the departments I talked to are letting their officers keep their personally purchased AW's. Nobody wants to buy it back and there is no mandate to do so.
        I like guns

        Comment

        • #19
          EssDee
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 70

          I saw a cop beating a guy with a flashlight.....
          I'm sure he sees a flashlight and quivers "***..as..ssau..llttt...weweweappponnn"

          Comment

          • #20
            lavey29
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 1126

            Originally posted by Notorious
            Did DOJ put out a new memo requiring that upon separation of employment?

            AFAIK, there is no mechanism for turning in your personally purchased AW nor was there anything written in the law about conversion to legal configuration.

            The parting shot by Moonbeam Brown was just his opinion as AG and given his background, it's no surprise that he wrote that to pass onto Kamala to carry out his wishes to disarm the populace.

            Until told otherwise, the departments I talked to are letting their officers keep their personally purchased AW's. Nobody wants to buy it back and there is no mandate to do so.


            Friend of mine from work told me that a buddy of his on a smaller Department got a letter to purchase a rifle and along with the DROS is a DOJ letter affidavit that you sign wherein you agree to surrender your rifle upon separation from the Department. I have not seen such letter personally but do believe it is part of the purchase/registration agreement. Now how DOJ is enforcing the surrender if you fail to honor the original agreement I do not know either. Larger Department are not issuing letters to purchase from my own personal knowledge.

            I will try and go by one of my local shops that does government purchases with Department letters and see if I can get a copy of the DOJ letter to scan and post on here during the week.
            Last edited by lavey29; 02-10-2013, 2:14 PM.

            Comment

            • #21
              Notorious
              Veteran Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 4695

              Originally posted by lavey29
              Friend of mine from work told me that a buddy of his on a smaller Department got a letter to purchase a rifle and along with the DROS is a DOJ letter affidavit that you sign wherein you agree to surrender your rifle upon separation from the Department. I have not seen such letter personally but do believe it is part of the purchase/registration agreement. Now how DOJ is enforcing the surrender if you fail to honor the original agreement I do not know either. Larger Department are not issuing letters to purchase from my own personal knowledge.

              I will try and go by one of my local shops that does government purchases with Department letters and see if I can get a copy of the DOJ letter to scan and post on here during the week.
              None of my buddies who have previously purchased rifles under the program had such a letter in their DROS from the DOJ.

              Just call Pro Force tomorrow to see if they know since they are one of the biggest dealers for LE AW.
              I like guns

              Comment

              • #22
                lavey29
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 1126

                The shop I use does quite a bit of sales vie department letter. I will try and get by them by mid week to see if they have a copy of the DOJ letter that I was referred to.

                Comment

                • #23
                  FiveSeven
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 2424

                  Originally posted by Notorious

                  However, if a LEO does not have an exempt AK, buying all the large capacity AK magazines doesn't matter because he still can't use the magazines in his bullet button locked AK as that is manufacturing an AW under CA laws. LEO's are not exempt from AW laws except as above.
                  "Featureless".

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Notorious
                    Veteran Member
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 4695

                    Originally posted by FiveSeven
                    "Featureless".
                    However, if a LEO does not have an exempt AK, buying all the large capacity AK magazines doesn't matter because he still can't use the magazines in his bullet button locked AK as that is manufacturing an AW under CA laws. LEO's are not exempt from AW laws except as above.
                    Thank you. One point at a time as I dissect what was said.

                    - "an exempt AK" denoting either registered or featureless

                    - "bullet button locked AK" denotes that it is not registerd or featureless

                    - "AW laws" state featureless is okay to use large capacity magazines

                    Therefore, what I had said covered your statement, but yeah, to make it even more obvious, thanks for pointing it out.
                    I like guns

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      FiveSeven
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 2424

                      The whole (my) point was/is, why would any leo have a need/want for "high" capacity AK mags?

                      Also, there are numerous small LE agencies that have less or different restrictions/requirements/view on what officer can use/own as a patrol rifle.
                      AK 74 (or even AKM) with decent optic is even better suited for the task imho than M4/AR.
                      Last edited by FiveSeven; 02-11-2013, 9:04 PM.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Notorious
                        Veteran Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 4695

                        Originally posted by FiveSeven
                        The whole (my) point was/is, why would any leo have a need/want for "high" capacity AK mags?
                        Same reason why any civilian would want an AK of any capacity.
                        I like guns

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          CBR_rider
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jan 2013
                          • 2670

                          Warhawk,
                          I think what he is trying to say is: How would you make the distinction that a LEO using high capacity magazines to train off-duty (for his on-duty assignments/skills) is any different than him/her using the same magazines while training on duty?

                          FiveSeven,
                          While I do want an AK74, I'm perfectly happy with my Colt AR for work. I don't see any advantage to be gained by changing weapon systems.
                          Originally posted by bwiese
                          [BTW, I have no problem seeing DEA Agents and drug cops hanging from ropes, but that's a separate political issue.]
                          Stay classy, CGF and Calguns.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            FiveSeven
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 2424

                            Advantages is Murphy's law in-itself. Something more simpler (with MUCH fewer parts), easier maintenance platform and just as easy to adapt to a specific user is better IMHO + it's just as accurate for intended distance.... Ultimately it's "whatever floats your boat" and as I stated, it's my opinion.

                            Originally posted by Notorious
                            Same reason why any civilian would want an AK of any capacity.
                            You won't find any disagreement from me on that... But, I'm going by what current law permits even thou I think it's pure garbage of a law.
                            Last edited by FiveSeven; 02-11-2013, 10:18 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              eviioiive
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 1620

                              LEOSA.
                              Originally posted by Kestryll
                              Your name has been publicly printed in newspapers and on the web, your expectation of privacy is flat gone.
                              Originally posted by CALGUNS.NET
                              You have been banned for the following reason: posting other member's personal info without permission. I don't care what your reasoning is that is not allowed.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                FiveSeven
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 2424

                                Originally posted by eviioiive
                                LEOSA.
                                Do you have first hand experience? As I've seen some officers were prosecuted for possessing unregistered AR's. LEOSA didn't help them much.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1