Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Assault Weapons for personal use by LEOs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    Notorious
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 4703

    Originally posted by hbm4
    Just wanted to see what you guys thought about the AG's opinion on retired or separated Officers surrendering their legally owned and paid for "AWs". See attached links.

    AG Opinion


    Letter from DOJ to retired Officer
    http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/...ult-Weapon.pdf
    I don't care what Moonbeam said about the issue as his parting gift to LE before he became governor. It's his OPINION. That's it. Nothing more. No court in the state or federal arena has addressed it and they better think hard about depriving property and due process if they do.
    I like guns

    Comment

    • #77
      AR15Man
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 116

      It's incredible that this is California's position;

      At the time of your retirement, the politicians believe that every violator, you've ever arrested, will lose his/her memory and will never, ever attempt to hurt you or your family.

      They also forgot to add into their legal opinion that; You are now guaranteed, by the Opinion of the State, that the State will now be required to have a 24/7 protection detain assigned to you in lieu possession of an AW.

      Happiness is seeing Komifornia in my tail lights.

      Comment

      • #78
        Notorious
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 4703

        I hear ya, I can't wait to get out of here too.
        I like guns

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1