Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

L.A. County Deputies to Avoid Chasing Armed Suspects!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Trigger Finger
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 105

    L.A. County Deputies to Avoid Chasing Armed Suspects!

    LA County deputies to avoid chasing armed suspects
    Thought you guys might get a laugh out of this!

    Link to article


    They could heard them into the City of L.A. At least LAPD still chases them!!!
    Last edited by Trigger Finger; 02-17-2010, 12:21 PM.
    Land of the Free Because of the Brave!
  • #2
    ocspeedracer
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 1147

    so if you're a criminal in LA i guess it's timed to be armed. Let's make sure we all protect the nice thieves, rapists, murderers, ped's and other upstanding scum-o-the earth types.

    i've been feeling for while and now again after reading that, it's hard to believe that CA politics are anything more than a big freaking joke. I may have to run for public office, i'm sick of this junk

    Comment

    • #3
      IrishJoe3
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 3804

      Originally posted by Trigger Finger
      At least LAPD still chases them!!!
      As does CHP
      Urban legends are a poor basis for making public policy.

      Comment

      • #4
        Fate
        Calguns Addict
        • Apr 2006
        • 9545

        Hey this is a WIN for UOCers. See a deputy? RUN! LOL
        sigpic "On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

        "Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
        , in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

        Comment

        • #5
          CaliTheKid
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 546

          Meanwhile-- during a training class in the new non-pursuit policy-- the following happened:

          February 12, 2010

          A 22-year-old graffiti tagger picked the wrong place Friday to leave his mark: a glass door at an aquatic center in Commerce that separated him from 100 Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies discussing having enough backup when chasing suspects, authorities said.

          Joshua Vasquez looked shocked as a throng of deputies began running toward him, said Capt. Mike Parker, who was teaching the class. Vasquez turned and ran as at least 40 deputies crammed through the doorway to get him, Parker said. Vasquez tripped over his own feet and fell, Parker said, and deputies restrained him.

          As it turned out, the incident was instructive to the deputies, who were participating in a training meeting.

          “We were discussing the importance of having backup when engaged in foot pursuits,” Parker said.

          That’s when the entire class was drawn to the doorway, where it looked like the suspect was waving at them, Parker said. “It turns out we could see him, but he couldn’t see us,” he said.

          Not lacking in backup, the deputies gave chase. But the suspect didn’t give up so easily, and he kicked out the rear window of a sheriff's cruiser before being further restrained, authorities said.

          Vasquez was booked on suspicion of felony vandalism to the glass door and to the cruiser.

          Comment

          • #6
            Trigger Finger
            Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 105

            Poor leadership and supervision results in overreaching policies that stop good police work. If there is a common trait that is occurring during these shootings that can be attributed to officer behavior, train and fix it. The answer isn't to ban it..that is weak leadership. I feel for L.A.S.O.
            Land of the Free Because of the Brave!

            Comment

            • #7
              SoCalDep
              Senior Member
              • May 2007
              • 815

              I haven't seen the new policy yet but I talked to one of the guys involved in making it. From what I hear it's not really a ban on anything but a "fight smarter, not harder" approach. The description in the article of the concept of containment is pretty bad.

              While there are many policies that I disagree with, this is one that I'm not sure is so bad...It's basically telling deputies to use resources if possible rather than try to chase someone on our own...A logical development from the current foot pursuit policy and something that is being done by a majority of deputies anyway.

              But time will tell....

              Comment

              • #8
                CSACANNONEER
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Dec 2006
                • 44094

                I understand this policy. It's much safer for the deputies! Besides, it'll give them more time to do other things. Right?
                NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor
                California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller
                Ventura County approved CCW Instructor
                Utah CCW Instructor


                Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners.

                sigpic
                CCW SAFE MEMBERSHIPS HERE

                KM6WLV

                Comment

                • #9
                  nobody33
                  Member
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 298

                  Depolicing is what this is called. And our country is moving more and more towards it. Eventually the police will be completely worthless.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    retired
                    Administrator
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 9409

                    From what little I've read about this policy, I don't think it is really all that new. I did a training film in the mid 80s while at IDT that focused on deputies splitting up and chasing a suspect.

                    It was prompted by the Dep. Pohlman shooting that occurred in 1978, among other issues.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Jonathan Doe

                      As far as I understand, it does not change anything on immediate threat the suspect poses. It more pertains to a chase and containment.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        cindynles
                        Veteran Member
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 2806



                        Too bad somebody didn't have a video camera. This would have easily made it on to one of those worlds dumbest criminals shows...
                        "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." B.Franklin,1759

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          CaliTheKid
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 546

                          Totally. I would have loved to have been there.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Trigger Finger
                            Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 105

                            I think this is really bad, in spirit and intent. It's giving armed suspects more courtesy than they're due, and it makes their lives more important than innocent citizens. This is about reducing OIS, period. They might cite other reasons, but all they're concerned about is subjective negative perception and numbers. Someone is going to exercise the wide latitude and discretion that they're claiming will still exist. Then they're going to quickly find themselves unemployed and prosecuted.


                            LA county officers get new guidelines on armed offenders
                            Better to contain than attempt to detain without backup
                            Land of the Free Because of the Brave!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Sarge744
                              Junior Member
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 19

                              I just spent a lot of time going over these new guidelines. There has been no change whatsoever to the foot pursuit policy. The only thing this covers is the options deputies have during a foot pursuit. When it may be better to set up a containment rather continue chasing. This has all been just common sense for years. The only difference now is many of the thoughts are in print. Don't read that much into how the press is going with it, or all you will get is a brief editorial from an untrained individual, attempting to paraphrase 36 pages of info for the sole purpose of selling news.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1