Went back and read the article link. Got this;
Another few questions if you dont mind. ....
It is my understanding that a LEO must witness infractions and misdemeanors, with certain exceptions on the latter, related to victims willing to pursue charges.
But felonies can be arrested, charged, and made to stick, with solid PC, and evidence that the subject actually committed the felony. Without a victim filing a complaint?
Please enlighten me if that is incorrect.
If this clown was charged with either 594 or 487 as felonies. Would a victim complaint, be required to get a conviction? Especially since the PG&E employee witnessed the theft, reported it, and was available for subpoenaed testimony. Whether PG&E pursued the matter or not?
No way this clown could ever make a judge believe he was innocent. That somebody else must have tied the 50 Ft log to his car, that he drove several miles through town, without him knowing it.
Or is it likely, IYO, that an ADA would just reject it. Due to lack of interest on PG&Es part?
BPD reported the utility pole belonged to PG&E and it was about to be installed. It added PG&E declined to proceed with any criminal charges.
It is my understanding that a LEO must witness infractions and misdemeanors, with certain exceptions on the latter, related to victims willing to pursue charges.
But felonies can be arrested, charged, and made to stick, with solid PC, and evidence that the subject actually committed the felony. Without a victim filing a complaint?
Please enlighten me if that is incorrect.
If this clown was charged with either 594 or 487 as felonies. Would a victim complaint, be required to get a conviction? Especially since the PG&E employee witnessed the theft, reported it, and was available for subpoenaed testimony. Whether PG&E pursued the matter or not?
No way this clown could ever make a judge believe he was innocent. That somebody else must have tied the 50 Ft log to his car, that he drove several miles through town, without him knowing it.

Or is it likely, IYO, that an ADA would just reject it. Due to lack of interest on PG&Es part?

Comment