Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What's the PCF?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bk23103
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 1088

    What's the PCF?

    Here's one for the motor jockeys out there.

    One fine morning, a methamphibean stole a 25' wooden utility pole from a PG&E yard and chained it to the back of his Chevy Malibu to take it home several miles away for... firewood?

    Anyway, the pole being dragged behind the car withered around like a snake and struck several parked cars, causing extensive damage.

    So the obvious question here... What's the PCF?
  • #2
    p7m8jg
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 1914

    Haven't heard PCF in years. Decades even.

    Howsabout:

    CVC 23103(A) - reckless driving endangering others

    Comment

    • #3
      Rustlin’ Jack
      Member
      • Feb 2020
      • 172



      24002.
      (a) It is unlawful to operate any vehicle or combination of vehicles which is in an unsafe condition, or which is not safely loaded, and which presents an immediate safety hazard

      Comment

      • #4
        bk23103
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 1088


        That was my first thought too. I've been off the street for a decade but someone tried to say it was a 594 and to kick it back to patrol.

        Comment

        • #5
          Rustlin’ Jack
          Member
          • Feb 2020
          • 172

          Originally posted by bk23103
          That was my first thought too. I've been off the street for a decade but someone tried to say it was a 594 and to kick it back to patrol.
          With intent, yes.
          Merely driving with head up where the sun don?t shine, no.

          Comment

          • #6
            painkiller
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2005
            • 940

            My retired motors buddy said cvc 23103 reckless is pcf, but if found on dui meth then then pcf is 23142(f)
            everyone has a phtographic memory,some just dont have the film

            Comment

            • #7
              Rustlin’ Jack
              Member
              • Feb 2020
              • 172

              Originally posted by painkiller
              My retired motors buddy said cvc 23103 reckless is pcf, but if found on dui meth then then pcf is 23142(f)
              Agreed. I skipped right to PCF for the act of damaging cars with the swinging pole. If impaired, the impairment becomes primary with the unsecured load as secondary.

              Comment

              • #8
                painkiller
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2005
                • 940

                Edit to response above, 23152f
                everyone has a phtographic memory,some just dont have the film

                Comment

                • #9
                  BigStiCK
                  Veteran Member
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 3750

                  Id go with 23114 Unsecured Load. A bit more specific than 24002.
                  Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought.

                  ~Pope John Paul II

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    bk23103
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2014
                    • 1088

                    Turns out there were some errors in my theoretical question. It was 50' long, and the involved vehicle was a Subaru. Of course, someone got pinched for meth, too.




                    “The Bakersfield Police Department would like to take this opportunity to stress to the public that dragging 50’ poles weighing in excess of 1,000 pounds with chains along city roadways is dangerous and against the law,” the news release said.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      L-2
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 1331

                      I wasn't a traffic guy so VC 22350 (the only safe speed would be zero mph) excessive speed.
                      (former) Glock and 1911 Armorer; LEO (now retired)

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        pacrat
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • May 2014
                        • 10280

                        Gentlemen;

                        Is there any policy that keeps a motor officer from charging pc-487 ? As well as the various options under the VC? According to an Edison employee buddy. Those poles cost several thousand dollars each.

                        Disclaimer; .... I acknowledge being a simple LE supporting concerned citizen. With no professional LE affiliation. So feel free to ignore my questions.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          bk23103
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 1088

                          Originally posted by pacrat
                          Gentlemen;

                          Is there any policy that keeps a motor officer from charging pc-487 ? As well as the various options under the VC? According to an Edison employee buddy. Those poles cost several thousand dollars each.

                          Disclaimer; .... I acknowledge being a simple LE supporting concerned citizen. With no professional LE affiliation. So feel free to ignore my questions.
                          Not at all, so long as there's a victim wishing to pursue it.

                          The PCF is the "Primary Collision Factor" though - so the driver in this instance was arrested for various charges, but the CVC violation that caused the accident(s) is what is up for debate here.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            pacrat
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • May 2014
                            • 10280

                            Originally posted by bk23103
                            [1] ... Not at all, so long as there's a victim wishing to pursue it.

                            [2] ... The PCF is the "Primary Collision Factor" though - so the driver in this instance was arrested for various charges, but the CVC violation that caused the accident(s) is what is up for debate here.
                            Thank you;

                            [1] ... Wouldnt 594 also require a victim to make it stick?

                            [2] ... I understand the PCF element. You earlier mentioned pc 594, and handing it to patrol. I didnt understand the [kick it back to patrol].

                            someone tried to say it was a 594 and to kick it back to patrol.
                            And vandalism can be a wobbler. So my thought was to go ahead and tie his dick in a knot with a felony.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Enzo rules
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2017
                              • 844

                              Good question and some great answers. Not being a motorhead and off the streets for over 20 years I have a question. Since the pole was stolen during the act of a grand theft, the trailer, is the hitting of the cars an TC. If it’s a TC I’m thinking unsafe load.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1