That is the correct analysis. In lieu of the Supreme Court decisions and the 9th Circuit's Peruta decision, allowing time, place, and manner restrictions on the carrying of firearms, we can expect legislatures to ban firearms in more places thereby eviscerating the right to bear arms outside of the home.
No one cited what if any law the defendant, Dwayne Ferguson, violated. The NY Gun Free School Zone Act, , provides:
A person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth
degree when:
Knowingly is an issue in the Buffalo case. However, NY Penal Code 400. Therefore, unless some other law exists banning handguns on school property, the defendant Dwayne Ferguson, is not criminally liable under the New York GFSZA, because he allegedly holds a concealed weapon permit.
No one cited what if any law the defendant, Dwayne Ferguson, violated. The NY Gun Free School Zone Act, , provides:
A person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth
degree when:
(3) He or she knowingly has in his or her possession a rifle, shotgun
or firearm in or upon a building or grounds, used for educational
purposes, of any school...
or firearm in or upon a building or grounds, used for educational
purposes, of any school...
Knowingly is an issue in the Buffalo case. However, NY Penal Code 400. Therefore, unless some other law exists banning handguns on school property, the defendant Dwayne Ferguson, is not criminally liable under the New York GFSZA, because he allegedly holds a concealed weapon permit.
Comment