
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
HRC: No attempt to overturn SCOTUS ruling on 2A
Collapse
X
-
HRC: No attempt to overturn SCOTUS ruling on 2A
sigpicTags: None -
Another lie from the greatest liar on this planet's history. -
JMO, but I think she's seen an opportunity to swing back towards the middle on the 2A in order to capture some who may not be thrilled with Trump.
I believe she's interested in is improved background checks. One can hope. Certainly a better position than banning classes of firearms.Comment
-
Exactly. Not falling for that bull**** again.
BTW, you're the president. The Supreme Court is *supposed* to be another branch of checks and balances, not an extension of your will, so really I don't even know why this would matter. Unless you're trying to say that's what the the Supreme Court should be? Yeah that'sComment
-
If your dumb enough to believe anything she says you don't deserve rightsOnly slaves don't need guns
Originally posted by epilepticninjaAmericans vs. Democrats
We already have the only reasonable Gun Control we need, It's called the Second Amendment and it's the government it controls.
What doesn't kill me, better runComment
-
JMO, but I think she's seen an opportunity to swing back towards the middle on the 2A in order to capture some who may not be thrilled with Trump.
I believe she's interested in is improved background checks. One can hope. Certainly a better position than banning classes of firearms.Welcome to OT, where hypocrisy is King, outrage is Queen and the Kingdom is on the shores of the Denial River.
__________________Comment
-
JMO, but I think she's seen an opportunity to swing back towards the middle on the 2A in order to capture some who may not be thrilled with Trump.
I believe she's interested in is improved background checks. One can hope. Certainly a better position than banning classes of firearms.Anchors Aweigh
sigpicComment
-
First of all, I don't trust Hillary. I think she's lying through her teeth about that.
Second, I'm not sure what she means by "would not attempt to overturn the Supreme Court’s ruling on Second Amendment rights." She can't just walk into the Supreme Court and ask that they overturn a precedent. What she CAN do is "urg[e] Congress to enact tighter gun-control measures," which may very well end up before the Supreme Court, but, with the anticipated replacement of Scalia, she is likely to get whatever she wants.Comment
-
First of all, I don't trust Hillary. I think she's lying through her teeth about that.
Second, I'm not sure what she means by She can't just walk into the Supreme Court and ask that they overturn a precedent. What she CAN do is "urg[e] Congress to enact tighter gun-control measures," which may very well end up before the Supreme Court, but, with the anticipated replacement of Scalia, she is likely to get whatever she wants.
But, I'm sure the judges she appoints would be in line with someone like a Judge Henderson from the DC Circuit, who's shown utter contempt through all her rulings which reject any meaningful 2A.Comment
-
When you consider the DNC people call the Democrat voters the stupid voters it should make you wonder.California's politicians and unionized government employees are a crime gang that makes the Mexican drug cartels look like a Girl Scout Troop in comparison.Comment
-
My contribution added to the OP. It's worth significantly more than the 1000 words.
That photo isn't cropped. It was just taken from the correct angle to hide most of the lower part of the "L." If you look closely, you can make out the very end of it at the back of her head.sigpicComment
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,855,031
Posts: 25,001,895
Members: 353,847
Active Members: 6,058
Welcome to our newest member, RhythmInTheMeat.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3649 users online. 147 members and 3502 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment