Alright, I did a hefty bit of searching but never quite came across my specific scenario. This one will be a good test of CalGun's collective CA knowledge
. If I can't get a straight answer here, might be over to an attorney knowledgeable in CA gun laws.
I bought a 1911 back in 2017 while a resident of CA. I gifted it to my father after he gave me a truck to set out on life with in ~2018. From what I understand he did not complete the intrafamily transfer + $19 to the DoJ. Now he is interested in passing it on to a friend of his as a gift.
From what I've read, there isn't a "time limit" for completing the DoJ form even though it says within 30 days of transfer. If he sets out to complete this form with a backdate of ~2018, would he need to wait until he gets a completed letter back from the DoJ before attempting to transfer via FFL to his friend? From what I've read he'd have up to a good ~year wait on his hands until then.
Before you ask.. 1) I am now a resident of Tennessee and 2) the handgun in question is off-roster. Both of those obviously present issues in the context of who the registered owner of the gun is to the CA DoJ
. If I can't get a straight answer here, might be over to an attorney knowledgeable in CA gun laws.I bought a 1911 back in 2017 while a resident of CA. I gifted it to my father after he gave me a truck to set out on life with in ~2018. From what I understand he did not complete the intrafamily transfer + $19 to the DoJ. Now he is interested in passing it on to a friend of his as a gift.
From what I've read, there isn't a "time limit" for completing the DoJ form even though it says within 30 days of transfer. If he sets out to complete this form with a backdate of ~2018, would he need to wait until he gets a completed letter back from the DoJ before attempting to transfer via FFL to his friend? From what I've read he'd have up to a good ~year wait on his hands until then.
Before you ask.. 1) I am now a resident of Tennessee and 2) the handgun in question is off-roster. Both of those obviously present issues in the context of who the registered owner of the gun is to the CA DoJ

Comment