Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Letter From Attorney General / LAPD Regarding Recent Purchase

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    Citizen Snips
    Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 237

    Originally posted by Dutch3
    I fill out the forms, knowing my information is going to provided to my FFL, BATFE and CA DOJ for the purpose of purchasing a firearm. Nothing else. Nowhere do I see anything indicating the information is also going to be provided to my local municipality within 48 hours, nor am I authorizing such a disclosure.

    Yes, I realize the information may be requested and obtained by law enforcement within the scope of a criminal investigation, but purchasing a firearm is not a crime.

    Sending intimidating letters with covertly obtained information should be a crime and probably is.
    Well said. Tongue-in-cheek, certain counties would love to make purchasing a firearm a crime.
    "How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of." -- Suzanna Hupp

    Comment

    • #62
      Get3CoffinsReady
      Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 202

      I just got one in less than a week, my ten period isn't even up yet and the purchase was in Pasadena for a rifle.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #63
        rkt88edmo
        Reptile&Samurai Moderator
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Dec 2002
        • 10057

        What about out of state sales, isn't DROS a CA thing so selling out of state just gets transferred via the inbound FFL and wouldn't go through DROS?
        If it was a snake, it would have bit me.
        Use the goog to search calguns

        Comment

        • #64
          Dano3467
          Calguns Addict
          • Mar 2013
          • 7381

          And the downward spiral of a once great nation/state continues, as the populace are impaled on an inclined double helix, with continued turning of the government S-driver...

          But on the bright side Obummer is on yet another fund raiser, & avoiding the job he gets paid for...

          Comment

          • #65
            all-cal
            Member
            • Dec 2013
            • 335

            Mark Feuer is one of the worst offenders in CA for introducing Nazi laws. He is responsible for long gun registration. Physically, he looks like a Sesame St. character.

            Comment

            • #66
              Dvrjon
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Nov 2012
              • 11257

              How does LA City get the firearm purchase information for the letters?

              2008 Rand Corp study: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand...RAND_TR512.pdf
              Strategies for Disrupting Illegal Firearms Markets
              A Case Study of Los Angeles

              Greg Ridgeway, Glenn L. Pierce, Anthony A. Braga, George Tita, Garen Wintemute, Wendell Roberts

              This study includes reviews on efforts to mitigate illegal firearm transfers in Los Angeles. It includes a "New Purchaser Notification Program" and a Criminal Purchase of Ammunition" program.

              Page 37:
              Letter Campaign
              regardless of where the purchases occurred. CalDOJ set up a secure Web site that was updated daily with tables of data on targeted transactions. Each morning, a Los Angeles city-attorney staff member would access the Web site and produce new letters using the new names and addresses in the table. The letters were mailed on day two or three of the ten-day waiting period and presumably arrived by day five. This left several days for the gun buyer to read the letter and consider the pending firearm transaction.
              The letter campaign was designed to examine if notification to purchasers would impact the incidence of straw purchases in South-Central LA (77th Street).

              Summary Conclusions, Page 39: (This was in 2008).
              The idea has generated substantial interest locally, and plans are forming to expand the program citywide, which will be phased into neighborhoods in such a way to allow us to evaluate its effect from a properly measured baseline. State officials await the full evaluation before considering a larger program.
              So, the program has expanded and the DOJ is most-probably still providing purchase data to LA. This also explains the design is based on residence, not place of purchase, although it may have expanded to both. That is, if you live outside the city and purchase within city limits, you get a letter; if you live within city limits and buy outside the city, you also get a letter.

              The report also discusses ammo sales restrictions . Good read to provide background on the origins of this stuff.

              Best.
              Last edited by Dvrjon; 07-11-2014, 8:41 AM.

              Comment

              • #67
                ja308
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Nov 2009
                • 12660

                That Rand outfit is pretty smart, reading their material I've discovered that earths temperature has always been constant, until humans started using fossil fuels !

                If anyone group can address gun problems and straw purchases effectively, it's certainly a think tank that denies earth has ever experianced " ice ages"
                Good work Rand ! I hope you got paid well .
                Last edited by ja308; 02-13-2015, 1:02 PM.

                Comment

                • #68
                  Vlad 11
                  Veteran Member
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 2961

                  Originally posted by Dvrjon
                  How does LA City get the firearm purchase information for the letters?

                  2008 Rand Corp study: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand...RAND_TR512.pdf
                  Strategies for Disrupting Illegal Firearms Markets
                  A Case Study of Los Angeles

                  Greg Ridgeway, Glenn L. Pierce, Anthony A. Braga, George Tita, Garen Wintemute, Wendell Roberts
                  https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...0&postcount=16

                  haha good find

                  this does need to be reiterated frequently.

                  We are the guinea pigs in this unfolding strategy. First they had the info on handgun purchases, now they have the info on the registered long guns. The next step will be ammunition tracking. I foresee letters regarding recent purchases of ammunition... you know to remind you of safe storage . They want to build a huge database of our info that they will plug into their studies. The conclusions of which will inevitably lead to more rights usurping legislation

                  They desire total information and total control

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    Dvrjon
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 11257

                    Originally posted by all-cal
                    Mark Feuer is one of the worst offenders in CA for introducing Nazi laws. He is responsible for long gun registration. Physically, he looks like a Sesame St. character.
                    First Nazi reference.

                    Invoking Godwin's law.

                    /thread.

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      Vlad 11
                      Veteran Member
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 2961

                      No denying that Mike Feuer is one of the worst, arguably the worst. But id say more of a Marxist

                      Ironic that his father is a WW2 vet, German prison camp survivor. And Mike is the champion of anti-civil rights, anti-freedom legislation



                      used his fathers war record for his City Attorney campaign.

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        anthonyca
                        Calguns Addict
                        • May 2008
                        • 6316

                        Originally posted by lastinline
                        Can this be some type of legal violation that could subject DOJ to monetary damages? My thought leans to a release of confidential information, a severe violations of a persons privacy, etc. Any of our more legal-savy members wish to comment?
                        My goal would be to inflict costs on both L.A. City and DOJ. The more we can cause them to be forced to spend the better.
                        Isn't is telling that the same politicians who say that asking to just look at an ID to vote is not acceptable because that would intimidate people into not voting are the same politicians who send out these letters?
                        https://www.facebook.com/pages/Union...70812799700206

                        Originally posted by Wherryj
                        I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          roger1022
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2008
                          • 2008

                          I guess they are sending this letter to buyers of any firearms now. I know someone who just DROS a long gun and low and behold they received a letter.

                          I did get one last year for a pistol purchase. Guess they found another use for the registration program.
                          You can give peace a chance...

                          We'll cover you if it doesn't work out...

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            advocatusdiaboli
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 5521

                            As the ALCU said when opposing the proposed federal gun registry last year, fearing that if the data were collected, someone would abuse it and referring to a registry database: "If you build it, they will come". (Taking a line from The Field of Dreams).

                            Well, the first ones (surely not the last) have come to mine the data. THIS is what happens when you register your firearms. the Jews in Berlin though is was a simple yellow star...but that was only the beginning. So it is here too.
                            Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              jetman624
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2011
                              • 514

                              Is this like a big brother "we know where you live" sort of thing?

                              Creepy as hell...

                              Comment

                              • #75
                                RRangel
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Oct 2005
                                • 5164

                                I would be tempted to pen a reply, and remind the attorney general and the city of Los Angeles, that the Second Amendment is an individual incorporated right. That I don't recall them solving all the city's problems, that they should be so concerned with, wasting time and effort on my dime attempting to intimidate people that exercise constitutional rights. I might go into great detail of how complicit they are to the nullification of such a constitutional right. Maybe even have it sent registered mail, so some political appointed lackey, would have to read it. Maybe a photo copy of the Bill of Rights in the envelope too.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1