Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bullet button rifle with a 30 round magazine shell (no internals) legal?
Collapse
X
-
-
Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA
CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
sigpic
No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.Comment
-
Wouldn't that make every rifle owner a felon? If the shell was not there you could pour an infinite amount of ammunition into the weapon by gravity...."I do not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
Originally posted by mossylet me guess this means the case will move as fast as a Tuttle on heroin now instead of a snail on salt.................Originally posted by LibrarianNeed we have a moderator behind every blade of grass?Comment
-
You would consider it a felony? I guess you never heard the term jury nullification? Sorry, but I would never convict anyone on a law that is unjust, but hey thats just me.
Yes, a 10/30 is what I will do then. I was just curious guys as I had never thought about it before.Comment
-
Has anyone ever done this? I'd expect it wouldn't feed reliably without spring pressure to both (A) keep the next round against the feed lips and (B) push it fast enough that it gets there before the buffer spring pushes the bolt carrier back forward. If it wouldn't function and there was no evidence the owner had intent to try to make it work, I couldn't convict.
IIRC, hopper-fed guns are not considered equipped with a large capacity magazine. That's essentially what you're creating.---
As of 10/10 the Governor has 121 bills left on his desk to sign or veto by 10/13.Comment
-
Has anyone ever done this? I'd expect it wouldn't feed reliably without spring pressure to both (A) keep the next round against the feed lips and (B) push it fast enough that it gets there before the buffer spring pushes the bolt carrier back forward. If it wouldn't function and there was no evidence the owner had intent to try to make it work, I couldn't convict.
IIRC, hopper-fed guns are not considered equipped with a large capacity magazine. That's essentially what you're creating.
Riiiiight sonny.
Tell that to a CA judge that a magazine tube without a floor plate and which is loadable and operational is not a magazine.
Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA
CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
sigpic
No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.Comment
-
Agreed.
While it may or may not be legal this is the point. What will the DA say? What will the jury say? What will the judge say?
Sometimes it's best to play it safe and go a bit beyond the technical understanding of law.
Additionally, the best phrase I usually use with such questions is "is it worth it?"
Does anyone remember the guy with an illegally configured sks. Cops came for a noise disturbance, he let them in and they saw the sks behind the couch. Boom, felony.Comment
-
You can consider it a felony under the law while you go for jury nullification. They are not mutually exclusive.You would consider it a felony? I guess you never heard the term jury nullification? Sorry, but I would never convict anyone on a law that is unjust, but hey thats just me.
Yes, a 10/30 is what I will do then. I was just curious guys as I had never thought about it before.
Thing is though, the types of people who end up on juries are unlikely to be up on gun rights, civil rights, etc. Working people get out of jury service more often than the people downing the EBT bought Dr Pepper, while chatting on their free Obama phone, only caring about themselves, who couldn't give a crap about "rights" as long as it doesn't affect their free money income. .Last edited by stix213; 11-18-2013, 7:33 PM.Comment
-
If YOU specifically were on a jury pertaining to this type of case, YOU would consider it a felony? SickeningComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,353
Posts: 25,043,640
Members: 354,731
Active Members: 5,870
Welcome to our newest member, Juan1302.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3996 users online. 26 members and 3970 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.



Comment