Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What happens when the anti-2A camp becomes desperate?
Collapse
X
-
[CENTER]CALIFORNIA: Love it, leave it /CENTER]
The right to keep and bear arms comes not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God. -
The difference is that anti-gun groups have pretty much unlimited money. They not only have their money, they use YOUR money against you in the form of taxes that they will throw at the law when it is challenged in court.
We can NEVER come up with the same amount of "desperation" because we'll have to fork over money for our side as well as the money to fight us. It's like running a race where one group runs downhill and the other runs uphill through molasses."What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?"
-Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
"Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
I like my guns like the left likes their voters-"undocumented".Comment
-
This is the correct answer.They're not desperate. More to the point, they don't need to be.
All the anti's need do in DC is wait for a suitably appropriate tragedy, and let their lapdogs in the Media do the rest. Thanks to the number of insane fools walking about in our society, they'll get their tragedy long before Obama packs up from the White House.
Hopefully we won't have another mass shooting, or at least not for a long time, but the gun control belief system requires them to assume that the next one they can exploit is just around the corner. They will bide their time.
I doubt that Boston made much difference. It didn't help their cause, for the reasons you list, but S649 was already dead by then.The factor which bailed us out at the Federal level was likely the Boston Bombing. Since the media had no choice but to cover that incident, the anti-gun agitprop machine got shut down right before the vote, which meant Joe and Jane SoccerMom didn't remember to call their Senators to support gun control.Comment
-
Absolutely not true. Bloomberg and his new group have a huge budget but that is very recent.
So when GWB was in office we had all the advantages you now claim the anti-2Aers have?[CENTER]CALIFORNIA: Love it, leave it /CENTER]
The right to keep and bear arms comes not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.Comment
-
Here's the reality: there is no desperation, only new legislation. So long as lobbyists and voters remain interested in gun control, new legislation will be introduced.
Same as our side: as long as the constituents and lobbyists are interested in gun rights, new legislation will be introduced.
There's no "new order", no secret agendas or conspiracies, just constituents and lobbyists using phone calls, letters, and influence to get legislation introduced.
How is gun legislation any different than other controversial issues such as gay marriage laws that vary by state and get heard in Supreme Court with no decisive federal ruling?Comment
-
Its not really their main issue so I just expect some Bush era freakouts. Maybe some idiot from democratic underground will try to shoot someone... to show guns are bad... and probably fail... [not as a conspiracy / false flag... just because they are pissed]Should AW, Universal Registration and other bills fail to become law (please, God), what then happens when the anti-2A camp (led by Mr. Obama) becomes desperate?
I'm sure we've all considered what we would individually do if we were faced by draconian, unconstitutional laws -- say we lived in NY for instance. What will the anti-2A camp if they are complete losers at the federal level?
The reason I ask is that I have long believed individuals and groups become most dangerous when they become desperate.
The bigger problem will be when the economy reacts to all the gov cash printing. They'll doublethink the blame onto us (it was the Iraq war and corp welfare!) and use it as a pretext for grabbing power (gotta protect people from those small gov people that got us in the ditch)...Last edited by sl0re10; 04-18-2013, 10:19 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I know but it has been bad for over 10 years now. The argument I keep making, as someone aware of what your seeing, is there is no way I will give up my weapons with people like that demanding it. I know they hate us. And the two crowds above have a lot of overlap.Comment
-
I think there is -- with BHO himself.Here's the reality: there is no desperation, only new legislation. So long as lobbyists and voters remain interested in gun control, new legislation will be introduced.
Same as our side: as long as the constituents and lobbyists are interested in gun rights, new legislation will be introduced.
There's no "new order", no secret agendas or conspiracies, just constituents and lobbyists using phone calls, letters, and influence to get legislation introduced.
How is gun legislation any different than other controversial issues such as gay marriage laws that vary by state and get heard in Supreme Court with no decisive federal ruling?
For nearly 5 years now his anti-2A backers have been frustrated that he hasn't done anything about guns. Then Newtown where he got pulled deep into the discourse when he got spanked.
Getting spanked as he did will tend to create a touch of desperation in a person like BHO. We'll see...[CENTER]CALIFORNIA: Love it, leave it /CENTER]
The right to keep and bear arms comes not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.Comment
-
Since they are going to scale up their attack on our civil rights, it is very important to take the power of the hands of people like Feinstein. We can do that only by voting her out.Comment
-
they are not desperate. these people have the long view of things. they are progressives, meaning progressive change. all change "forward" is progress, but the change happens progressively. this is as opposed to the bolshevik maximalist approach. bosheviks (and jacobins before them) waned massive and sudden total and complete change. but progressives are of a different dna. their's is one of slowly marching.
they won't be desperate and they won't be disheartened. they will do what they've always done, which is to continue to chip away, push, alter, etc., and slowly and steadily inch forward. they see the big picture, the long haul. that is the exact nature of progressives.
look at where we are today versus say 75 years ago. we live in a regulatory nightmare. we have a massive and infinitely complex taxation system. we have a massive redistributionist welfare state. it didn't happen overnight. we are so far along on that path, that any stumbling blocks on the way are just that. fascists like bloomberg and his ilk, whatever, they have money, time, and patience. I really wish it was a conspiracy, but it's simply not.
perhaps you've heard of the Cloward-Pliven strategy?
it's not supposed to happen overnight. it's an open and obvious plan. incrementally, they will succeed. remember, they didn't lose. they just didn't win. this time. yet. see, we didn't win, we just didn't lose. this time. yet.
they failed but when they win, they get nothing from it. for them, losing and winning are the same outcome. winning only serves them in that it's a step closer. losing means nothing either. they are no better or worse off either way.
we fight and win, we've expended resources, and still we're right where we were at the start. we lose, and we never recover what we've lost. yes, we've been helped by heller and macdonald, and those are great in that we actually gained from them. but don't look at them other than simply more obstacles for the fascists to overcome. and it won't matter anyways because they're going to "change" the culture anyway. hot on the heels of heller the kalifornia legislature is set to make millions of citizens into felons (with marlin 60's) and they don't care one bit. you think they care at all about some SCOTUS decision? please.
desperation has never been a hallmark of progressives. look how long they've been at it. you think they'll ever stop.NRA Life Member since 1990
They're not liberals, they're leftists. Please don't use the former for the latter. Liberals are Locke, Jefferson, Burke, Hayek. Leftists are progressives, Prussian state-socialists, fascists. Liberals stand against the state and unequivocally support liberty. Leftists support state tyranny.

Comment
-
Is there anything that's not a police state, world government, or secret society conspiracy with some of you guys? Just like we believe in gun rights other folks believe in gun control. Both groups will vote for representatives who will introduce legislation in their behalf and the constitution sets limits in how far either side can go. Recently those limits have been tested in cases such as Heller and McDonald.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,263
Posts: 25,042,265
Members: 354,731
Active Members: 5,944
Welcome to our newest member, Juan1302.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3710 users online. 154 members and 3556 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.


Comment