Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Quick Q: Status of "Vermont Carry" legislation in TX?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paladin
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Dec 2005
    • 12382

    Quick Q: Status of "Vermont Carry" legislation in TX?

    I remember years ago (late '90s?), Dr. Suzanna Hupp was pushing to take TX to "Vermont Carry" (like Alaska too).

    I know that did not pass back then. Does anyone know if the NRA or others are still trying to get that passed? I'm just curious.

    Thanks ahead of time. I'll ck back next weekend for any replies.

    Until then. . .
    240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.
  • #2
    M. Sage
    Moderator Emeritus
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Jul 2006
    • 19759

    Just last year, IIRC, Texas got something close: it's now legal to carry concealed while "traveling", no permits needed.
    Originally posted by Deadbolt
    "We're here to take your land for your safety"

    "My Safety?" *click* "There, that was my safety"
    sigpicNRA Member

    Comment

    • #3
      stag1500
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2006
      • 669

      Originally posted by M. Sage
      Just last year, IIRC, Texas got something close: it's now legal to carry concealed while "traveling", no permits needed.
      Kind of like Nevada. Good for them.
      Achievement of your happiness is the only moral purpose of your life, and that happiness, not pain or mindless self-indulgence, is the proof of your moral integrity, since it is the proof and the result of your loyalty to the achievement of your values. -Ayn Rand

      Comment

      • #4
        Paladin
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Dec 2005
        • 12382

        Originally posted by M. Sage
        Just last year, IIRC, Texas got something close: it's now legal to carry concealed while "traveling", no permits needed.
        Thanks for the update.

        The more I think about it, the more I think that VT Carry should be our ultimate goal. To me, the idea that you have the right to use deadly force to defend your/others' lives in public, and yet the gov't that forbids you from carrying a deadly weapon is under no legal duty to protect your life, is ludicrous, esp for females. The only deadly force we can use is unarmed combat or improvised weapons against BGs armed w/knives, clubs and/or guns? That's insane!

        For far too long we have put up with some politician w/a shield and a gun paternalistically saying it is for our own good, that the public can't be trusted w/firearms in public, that alpha-male heroes of the "thin blue line" will protect us. Hogwash! Sorry, but in the vast majority of cases, YOU will be your own first responder. The only question is whether you'll be equipped and trained to defend your life or not. LEOs are usually 2nd responders. If they get there before you're dead, great. If not, your descendants can't sue the gov't for having disarmed you.

        Someone in another thread (no, I'm not going to track it down), said CCW permits support this loss of our 2nd A RKBA (and someone else said they may be a way of registering gun owners). That is perhaps true, but, IMO, there is no way (barring a serious Heller win) that the PRK will go straight from May Issue to VT Carry. So I see increasing May Issue and then going to Shall Issue as necessary evils until we can get to VT Carry.
        Last edited by Paladin; 04-20-2008, 7:57 AM.
        240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1