Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hi all, need assistance on how the semi MG42/M53's are classified/dealt with .

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    CHS
    Moderator Emeritus
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Jan 2008
    • 11338

    Originally posted by DisgruntledReaper
    ALSO, FEDERALLY the MG42 was NOT classed as a rifle...until a few years ago when they RECLASSED IT... NOW this POS state or other states CAN pass laws on what is a rifle, OAL,'features' etc... so maybe HERE it was always classed BUT far as I know they were interestingly NOT included in ANY of the OFFICIAL AW ban lists(that I have been able to find) UNTIL the POS 2000 law....... interesting huh?........
    What on earth are you talking about? No one ever reclassified a semi-auto MG42/M53. Not the feds, not the state.

    And until 2000 there WERENT any "official" AW ban lists. The feds never had a ban list at all. The federal AWB just said you couldn't have a semi-auto rifle with more than two evil features. The MG42 never would have qualified for that ban to begin with because it only had a pistol grip and no other evil features like a collapsible stock or bayonet lug.

    All this talk of lists and reclassification... Can you please tell me what your actual point is?
    Please read the Calguns Wiki
    Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
    --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

    Comment

    Working...
    UA-8071174-1