Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Portantino at it again: AB1527 long gun open carry ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kcbrown
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2009
    • 9097

    Originally posted by OleCuss
    Also, I think part of Emily's travails was the eagerness for a very particular firearm which was not readily available in the proper configuration.

    I suspect Gene is going to fix that particular problem for DC as well as for California.
    We all want to see Gene's Package.

    The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

    The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

    Comment

    • hoffmang
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Apr 2006
      • 18448

      Originally posted by OleCuss
      We're almost at the stage where we (I use the term loosely) win when we win and we win when we lose.
      My god it's nice to know that our strategy isn't lost on everyone!

      -Gene
      Last edited by hoffmang; 01-24-2012, 10:48 PM. Reason: is, isn't... meh.
      Gene Hoffman
      Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

      DONATE NOW
      to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
      Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
      I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


      "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

      Comment

      • Dreaded Claymore
        Veteran Member
        • May 2010
        • 3231

        Gene's Package

        Originally posted by kcbrown
        We all want to see Gene's Package.
        I'm posting these just in case some people haven't seen them:


        Attached Files

        Comment

        • kcbrown
          Calguns Addict
          • Apr 2009
          • 9097

          Originally posted by hoffmang
          My god it's nice to know that our strategy is lost on everyone!
          The more confusion, the better, eh?


          (I suspect you meant "isn't" where you said "is")
          The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

          The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

          Comment

          • hoffmang
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Apr 2006
            • 18448

            Originally posted by kcbrown
            (I suspect you meant "isn't" where you said "is")
            Err.. that!

            Editing to fix.

            -Gene
            Gene Hoffman
            Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

            DONATE NOW
            to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
            Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
            I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


            "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

            Comment

            • kcbrown
              Calguns Addict
              • Apr 2009
              • 9097

              Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
              I'm posting these just in case some people haven't seen them:


              The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

              The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

              Comment

              • KylaGWolf
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2008
                • 1698

                Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                Great. I guess the open carriers want all of us to be required to always transport our long guns in locked case at all times. Great going morons!
                You would be wrong when you say "all" open carriers want to screw up rights for everyone else. But I will say the open carrying of long guns was not the smartest choice in the world.
                "I declare to you that women must not depend upon the protection of man, but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." Susan B. Anthony

                Comment

                • KylaGWolf
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 1698

                  Originally posted by sholling
                  Really? Then why wasn't UOC banned 30 years ago, or 5 years ago? Because nobody was dumb enough to get soccer moms riled up and give the legislature an excuse.


                  It's going to take a whole lot of phone calls, and letter writing, and emails to try to slow this train. We probably can't stop them from passing the ban but a lot of man hours are going to get eaten up trying.


                  Yes I can, it's the gun grabbers in the legislature and the UOCers that dared the legislature to ban UOC. Not that the UOCers care but many of us had long gun UOC as part of a contingency plan for bugging out - that's out the window. Thanks to the UOCers we get to pack locked gun cases while bugging out.

                  You know someone said it earlier in this thread but bears repeating by attacking each other doing the whole damn blame game isn't going to do anyone good and only cause infighting when we should all be working together to make sure that this one doesn't pass.

                  As to the whole UOCers NOT all were in it for in your face "its my right" and to scare soccer moms. But there are some of us that did it for protection. That's right protection. Yes it was unloaded but damn it was still my best chance of freaking getting away if something went that far south. I can't run away, less lethal forms of self defense may or may not work (depends if my own arm is working right or not). And well I stood down even BEFORE Gene and the rest asked, and have remained so even though it bothers the hell out of me to do so. As for carrying long guns in public IMHO it was stupid and crazy and wanted no part of it.
                  "I declare to you that women must not depend upon the protection of man, but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." Susan B. Anthony

                  Comment

                  • QQQ
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 2243

                    Originally posted by Gray Peterson
                    This is categorically false. UOC only became banned after it was practiced in a wide-scale fashion.
                    So you're saying that Brady would have been okay with legalized unloaded open carry indefinitely if we only just never chose to exercise the right?
                    Please.

                    Comment

                    • BMC
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 1082

                      Dunno if it has been posted or not. If so...carry on.

                      The AB1527 bill : http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/...ntroduced.html

                      Long read. The more important stuff is at the first and last thirds of it. Note: it does specifically say that it is legal to unloaded open carry "non handgun" on private property and anywhere it is legal to discharge a firearm, among other places noted.
                      Originally posted by fullrearview
                      I would by a prius and put a diesel engine in and tune it so black soot would just bellow out the back, and stop all traffic behind me while I drive through Berkley

                      Comment

                      • TNP'R
                        Calguns Addict
                        • May 2010
                        • 7832

                        My prayers are with the state of CA and its gun owners I hope this doesn't happen to you all. Its uncalled for and disgusting to see it happening.

                        Comment

                        • Gray Peterson
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 5817

                          Originally posted by QQQ
                          So you're saying that Brady would have been okay with legalized unloaded open carry indefinitely if we only just never chose to exercise the right?
                          Please.
                          California Legislature only responds to manufactured crisis engineered by the anti-gun news media in California, as well as police leadership groups. Most of those manufactured crisis bills failed in the last few years as more and more things were regulated in the late 1990's and early 2000's under Governor Gray Davis.

                          For example, a full concealed LTC allowed someone to open carry statewide in California until 2009, when someone went into Los Angeles and open carried on such LTC and couldn't be charged with anything for it. That's when the Legislature went into action and fixed it for the CSSA and the CPOA, and it was such an outside the norm thing that it was able to be done without much fanfare.

                          Comment

                          • fiddletown
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 4928

                            Originally posted by QQQ
                            So you're saying that Brady would have been okay with legalized unloaded open carry indefinitely if we only just never chose to exercise the right?...
                            Don't be silly. UOC simply wasn't on anyone's radar -- that is until a bunch of folks decided to stage public demonstrations, invite the media and otherwise call attention to themselves. At that point, enough people expressed annoyance that it became apparent that there was political capital to be made by banning the practice.
                            "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

                            Comment

                            • tjburke85
                              Junior Member
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 74

                              Lets vote these police state legislators out!

                              Comment

                              • fiddletown
                                Veteran Member
                                • Jun 2007
                                • 4928

                                Originally posted by tjburke85
                                Lets vote these police state legislators out!
                                The problem is that right now there aren't enough of us to do that. We need to understand that and find ways to deal with that reality. So how do we get more voters on our side? Here's a hint: UOC wasn't the way.
                                "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1