Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Lungren crosses party lines and National Rifle Association
Collapse
X
-
Bill Wiese
San Jose, CA
CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
sigpic
No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer. -
Star Wars Is Awesome
This post is tied with another one for the Best Post Ever award. May the Force be with you!Comment
-
NRA linked article in "The Hill"
According to this article, the reason Lungren gave was the lack of any minimum training standards.
While I would have no problem with the bill as currently constituted, I think by not setting a basic minimum standard we are making a mistake that will give cover to Obama when he vetoes it.
Plus, the only way this will become law this session is if it is passed over his veto. Do we have the votes for that?
Maybe the plan is to let Obama veto it, then pass a bill with the minimum standards and put him in the position of either signing it or coming up with another stupid reason for vetoing it - maybe in an election year.Comment
-
I HATE the logic that we sholdn't do something because it is going to get vetoed. THAT IS THE POINT OF GOVERNMENT! PROPOSE SOMETHING! If it doesn't pass or gets vetoed, you still did it!
This attitude that you should only try to pass the laws that are easy is killing me... What is the point of legislating if you wait on your butt till everyone agrees?Matt Brown
Rifleman/214 - November 2014Comment
-
Last edited by mag360; 10-27-2011, 4:12 PM.just happy to be here. I like talking about better ways to protect ourselves.
Shop at AMAZON to help Calguns Foundation
CRPA Life Member. Click here to Join.
NRA Member JOIN HERE/Comment
-
Dealing with "betrayers" is the fastest way of being feared by our enemies. Never forget that.Comment
-
According to this article, the reason Lungren gave was the lack of any minimum training standards.
While I would have no problem with the bill as currently constituted, I think by not setting a basic minimum standard we are making a mistake that will give cover to Obama when he vetoes it.
Plus, the only way this will become law this session is if it is passed over his veto. Do we have the votes for that?
Maybe the plan is to let Obama veto it, then pass a bill with the minimum standards and put him in the position of either signing it or coming up with another stupid reason for vetoing it - maybe in an election year.Comment
-
I think that can be arranged.Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.
90% of winning is simply showing up.
"Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green
sigpic
NRA Benefactor MemberComment
-
Comment
-
If we could, we should flood Ventura with pro gun Dem candidates. I know a whole bunch of people there who never look past the (D) on the voting form.
Mind you, Dems generally tend to behave like that - and so do more than a few GOP voters.John -- bitter gun owner.
All opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
sigpicComment
-
-
Dan Lundgren may be a RINO. He may also be a craven opportunist – or, more charitably, he may simply be responding to the wishes of his constituents. But where are the facts that support the notion that there are any better alternatives in the California Democratic Party?
Head on pike time. Punish the betrayer, vote him out.Comment
-
Failing to be sufficiently pro-gun simply increases the level of disgust for a politician that someone is predisposed to dislike.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,856,064
Posts: 25,015,213
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,890
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4280 users online. 102 members and 4178 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment