Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Dan Lungren crosses party lines and National Rifle Association

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    bwiese
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Oct 2005
    • 27621

    Originally posted by Goosebrown
    "Now is it really worth your focus ,to concentrate your efforts on Lundgren? "

    You know, probably it is. In a conflict like we are in with the Democrats, you really aren't going to sway any opinions and it is probably a bad investment to try. What you *can* do is make sure that your own people follow your lead without question. If DL isn't towing the line, better to lose him as an example to the others than to continue limping along with him because he's better than the others.
    Exactly.

    Eat "your own" first - especially if he's from a party that touts RKBA as a plank.

    I do think that the CA Republican party needs to remove RKBA as a plank given their irrelevancy.

    Bill Wiese
    San Jose, CA

    CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
    sigpic
    No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
    to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
    ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
    employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
    legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

    Comment

    • #62
      Dreaded Claymore
      Veteran Member
      • May 2010
      • 3231

      Star Wars Is Awesome

      Originally posted by Volksgrenadier
      It's treason, then.

      This post is tied with another one for the Best Post Ever award. May the Force be with you!

      Comment

      • #63
        vincewarde
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 1911

        NRA linked article in "The Hill"

        According to this article, the reason Lungren gave was the lack of any minimum training standards.

        While I would have no problem with the bill as currently constituted, I think by not setting a basic minimum standard we are making a mistake that will give cover to Obama when he vetoes it.

        Plus, the only way this will become law this session is if it is passed over his veto. Do we have the votes for that?

        Maybe the plan is to let Obama veto it, then pass a bill with the minimum standards and put him in the position of either signing it or coming up with another stupid reason for vetoing it - maybe in an election year.

        Comment

        • #64
          Goosebrown
          Member
          • May 2010
          • 346

          I HATE the logic that we sholdn't do something because it is going to get vetoed. THAT IS THE POINT OF GOVERNMENT! PROPOSE SOMETHING! If it doesn't pass or gets vetoed, you still did it!

          This attitude that you should only try to pass the laws that are easy is killing me... What is the point of legislating if you wait on your butt till everyone agrees?
          Matt Brown
          Rifleman/214 - November 2014

          Comment

          • #65
            mtptwo
            Member
            • Feb 2009
            • 400

            Oh how I despise my rep.

            Comment

            • #66
              mag360
              Calguns Addict
              • Jun 2009
              • 5198

              Originally posted by bwiese
              Lou Correa, Rod Wright, Nicole Parra...
              So far Alyson Huber has voted down everything. Interestingly enough, Mike Gatto voted no on AB809, AB144 but yes on SB427. There is some hope for people like him.
              Last edited by mag360; 10-27-2011, 4:12 PM.
              just happy to be here. I like talking about better ways to protect ourselves.

              Shop at AMAZON to help Calguns Foundation

              CRPA Life Member. Click here to Join.

              NRA Member JOIN HERE/

              Comment

              • #67
                Gray Peterson
                Calguns Addict
                • Jan 2005
                • 5817

                Originally posted by bwiese
                Exactly.

                Eat "your own" first - especially if he's from a party that touts RKBA as a plank.

                I do think that the CA Republican party needs to remove RKBA as a plank given their irrelevancy.
                Dealing with "betrayers" is the fastest way of being feared by our enemies. Never forget that.

                Comment

                • #68
                  dantodd
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 9360

                  Originally posted by vincewarde
                  According to this article, the reason Lungren gave was the lack of any minimum training standards.

                  While I would have no problem with the bill as currently constituted, I think by not setting a basic minimum standard we are making a mistake that will give cover to Obama when he vetoes it.

                  Plus, the only way this will become law this session is if it is passed over his veto. Do we have the votes for that?

                  Maybe the plan is to let Obama veto it, then pass a bill with the minimum standards and put him in the position of either signing it or coming up with another stupid reason for vetoing it - maybe in an election year.
                  The only way this will get through is as an amendment to must-pass legislation.
                  Coyote Point Armory
                  341 Beach Road
                  Burlingame CA 94010
                  650-315-2210
                  http://CoyotePointArmory.com

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    jdberger
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 8944

                    Originally posted by bwiese
                    Dannyboy Lungren is a prime example of how often "the right hates rights", and how you should never assume Reeps are pro-gun by default.

                    Lungren is not doing *that* well in his district and I'd love to see him taken out by a pro-gun (or even gun-neutral) Dem.
                    I think that can be arranged.
                    Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.

                    90% of winning is simply showing up.

                    "Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green

                    sigpic
                    NRA Benefactor Member

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      dantodd
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 9360

                      Originally posted by ja308
                      Why is an antigun republican more disgusting than a democratic one?

                      Further why do C+ republicans get more anger than F rated democrats?
                      just asking
                      Simply because R's pander for gunnie votes and D's don't.
                      Coyote Point Armory
                      341 Beach Road
                      Burlingame CA 94010
                      650-315-2210
                      http://CoyotePointArmory.com

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        Glock22Fan
                        Calguns Addict
                        • May 2006
                        • 5752

                        If we could, we should flood Ventura with pro gun Dem candidates. I know a whole bunch of people there who never look past the (D) on the voting form.

                        Mind you, Dems generally tend to behave like that - and so do more than a few GOP voters.
                        John -- bitter gun owner.

                        All opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.
                        I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          ElvenSoul
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Apr 2008
                          • 17431

                          Not surprised anymore by our politicos!
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            navyinrwanda
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 599

                            Originally posted by bwiese
                            Lou Correa, Rod Wright, Nicole Parra...

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              Gray Peterson
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 5817

                              Originally posted by navyinrwanda
                              Dan Lundgren may be a RINO. He may also be a craven opportunist – or, more charitably, he may simply be responding to the wishes of his constituents. But where are the facts that support the notion that there are any better alternatives in the California Democratic Party?
                              When it comes politics and political gamesmanship, facts do not matter. Mr. Lungren demanded an amendment to get his support (the study) and then voted against the underlying bill.

                              Head on pike time. Punish the betrayer, vote him out.

                              Comment

                              • #75
                                navyinrwanda
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 599

                                Originally posted by ja308
                                Why is an antigun republican more disgusting than a democratic one?

                                Further why do C+ republicans get more anger than F rated democrats?
                                just asking
                                It's possible that some pro-gun people are also Democrats. Or they may really dislike Republicans.

                                Failing to be sufficiently pro-gun simply increases the level of disgust for a politician that someone is predisposed to dislike.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1