Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

H.R. 58/S. 1691, The Firearms Interstate Commerce Reform Act

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • safewaysecurity
    Calguns Addict
    • Jun 2010
    • 6166

    H.R. 58/S. 1691, The Firearms Interstate Commerce Reform Act

    H.R. 58/S. 1691, introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Rep. Dan Boren (D-OK) in the House and by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) in the Senate, would remove several antiquated and unnecessary restrictions imposed on interstate firearms business since 1968


    Originally posted by cudakidd
    I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
    ^
  • #2
    hoffmang
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2006
    • 18448

    And they just can't wait to see if Gura will win Lane v. Holder can they...

    -Gene
    Gene Hoffman
    Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

    DONATE NOW
    to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
    Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
    I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


    "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

    Comment

    • #3
      dantodd
      Calguns Addict
      • Aug 2009
      • 9360

      If Obama signs such a law then Lane gets mooted. If a later legislature and president decide to reinstate the restrictions we get saddled with that bad law.

      If they wait until Gura wins we will never have to worry about interstate restrictions.

      Also, all the money and time Gura spent litigating will be lost if this passes but if they wait until it is decided then Gura will get paid.

      Gura getting paid is a good thing.
      Coyote Point Armory
      341 Beach Road
      Burlingame CA 94010
      650-315-2210
      http://CoyotePointArmory.com

      Comment

      • #4
        safewaysecurity
        Calguns Addict
        • Jun 2010
        • 6166

        Isn't it in the appellate process to determine standing? The case itself isn't even at issue yet right?
        Originally posted by cudakidd
        I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
        ^

        Comment

        • #5
          hoffmang
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Apr 2006
          • 18448

          Originally posted by safewaysecurity
          Isn't it in the appellate process to determine standing? The case itself isn't even at issue yet right?
          Because the case was at a Preliminary Injunction hearing, it's basically denovo so all the issues are on the table. Either way, that court system is a rocket docket.

          -Gene
          Gene Hoffman
          Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

          DONATE NOW
          to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
          Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
          I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


          "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

          Comment

          • #6
            yellowfin
            Calguns Addict
            • Nov 2007
            • 8371

            Perhaps it's a squeeze play like w/ Illinois carry?
            "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
            Originally posted by indiandave
            In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
            Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1