Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gov. Brown is no fool
Collapse
X
-
I am a citizen 24/7, and as such would very much appreciate CCW rights as well.
sigpic
Hunter S. Thompson
The Great Shark Hunt: Strange Tales From a Strange TimeComment
-
There were a few other things that were against Bradley with black voters. We have to remember that although he was African American, he was in the LAPD. So, even though he was black, he was a cop first and foremost. Since he made it in the political ranks of the LAPD as well as at city hall, he was going to be against citizens having firearms, as are any other LEO brass in this city and county. They first and foremost want control, taking away guns and/or ammo, or any limitations is what they want.Maybe you don't know about the 1982 Prop 15, that also cost Tom Bradley the Governorship.
See here.....http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15220.html
Most politicians and members of the legal community (brass), share this view, even if they do not claim it. This is why the record on anti gun legislation is so bad on the Reps watch, because that is what their keepers want.
You are preaching to the choir here, but no matter what, LEOs will have CCWs as long as police carry guns. It just goes with the territory.I love California, but I am afraid of its government.
Those who choose safety over freedom are neither safe or free!
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." (Tacitus, Roman historian 55-117 A.D.)Comment
-
Yes... 30 years ago, it failed miserably. That was ancient history, wayyyyyy back in the day when restaurants had the option to have a smoking sectionMaybe you don't know about the 1982 Prop 15, that also cost Tom Bradley the Governorship.
See here.....http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15220.html
I should have clarified... no RKBA restrictions on a state level have ever been passed on a ballot referendum in CA.
I do recall Maryland having a "saturday night pistol ban" by referendum (58% approval).
I do recall Colorado having gun show restrictions by ballot referendum.
I do recall Oregon having gun show restrictions by ballot referendum.
California is by far the most referendum happy state in the union, and for all the anti-RKBA money, politicians, and rabblerousers, not one restriction has become law by the ballot box.
Last edited by Jared1981; 10-19-2011, 8:59 PM.Comment
-
Kind of like homosexual marriage? personally, I don't care either way, but the majority spoke. Isn't it great that the courts can save us from ourselves?Last edited by rt66paul; 10-20-2011, 8:55 AM.I love California, but I am afraid of its government.
Those who choose safety over freedom are neither safe or free!
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." (Tacitus, Roman historian 55-117 A.D.)Comment
-
It's not the courts that are saving us from ourselves, it's the constitution. This is a great example of the fact that we are a Constitutional Republic, not a pure democracy. The government is limited by the constitution (that's the idea anyways) and it doesn't matter if a majority of people feel a certain way, you can't violate the constitution. There is a way to change the constitution, this is the proper course of action if the majority of Americans want to allow our government to do something that violates the constitution.member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF
Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland YeeComment
-
+millions!It's not the courts that are saving us from ourselves, it's the constitution. This is a great example of the fact that we are a Constitutional Republic, not a pure democracy. The government is limited by the constitution (that's the idea anyways) and it doesn't matter if a majority of people feel a certain way, you can't violate the constitution. There is a way to change the constitution, this is the proper course of action if the majority of Americans want to allow our government to do something that violates the constitution.Comment
-
I keep telling people this:
WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT
No elected official operates in a vacuum. Things that are wrong can be sued over. Anyone can run for office.
Our system DOES work - it's just that people need to get off the couch.
Comment
-
I love this state except for the ridiculous gun laws imposed upon responsible people by...irresponsible people. If we had AZ or UT gun laws, I think the rest of the nation would be empty cause everyone would be here.
Former political prisoner who escaped on 9-24-23.Comment
-
How can Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) be constitutional and yet Prop 8 unconstitutional? And the people of California used their proper way to change our Constitution. In saying this, I'm not saying I agree with Prop 8. Just posing the question.It's not the courts that are saving us from ourselves, it's the constitution. This is a great example of the fact that we are a Constitutional Republic, not a pure democracy. The government is limited by the constitution (that's the idea anyways) and it doesn't matter if a majority of people feel a certain way, you can't violate the constitution. There is a way to change the constitution, this is the proper course of action if the majority of Americans want to allow our government to do something that violates the constitution.sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
Oh, look... Bunnies!
All for giving opiates to the masses. or something like that, uhmm... anything, but this thread got from what to where?
Maybe going back to name-calling them "freedom-hatin'-libruls?" - that's always a crowd pleaser...The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty argumentsComment
-
Whatever this guy was carrying.. http://abcnews.go.com/US/zanesville-deputy-killed-charging-bear-shot-feet/story?id=14775964Comment
-
Which defense of marriage act are you talking about? The federal one? Proposition 22? Be more specific.
If California passed at the ballot box via initiative a constitutional amendment stating that handgun possession was to banned to civilians, it would violate the 14th amendment and specifically McDonald, and lawsuits would be immediately filed, probably with a TRO (and a TRO would easily be granted in this particular case given the strength of McDonald).
Proper way to amend a state constitution on paper doesn't meet it passes federal constitutional muster. See Reitman v. MulkeyComment
-
As Gray said, the states are limited by the Bill of Rights through the 14th amendment. So CA's constitution cannot violate the COTUS. At least, I would think that's how it's supposed to work. Honestly, I don't understand why explicit incorporation is required to have some amendments be enforced against the states. This is been one of my major questions about incorporation since McDonald, maybe somebody could pipe in on that? hmmm Gray???
I also don't know enough about the federal DOMA. To me, it seems totally unconstitutional.member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF
Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland YeeComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,255
Posts: 25,029,582
Members: 354,385
Active Members: 6,348
Welcome to our newest member, JU83.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3049 users online. 141 members and 2908 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.



Comment