Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Deadline looming...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Centurion_D
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 1983

    Deadline looming...

    Is anyone else beginning to sweat bullets about SB 427, SB 819, AB 144 and AB 809. I understand the Gov has till midnight tonight to veto these bills. Is that correct?
  • #2
    HowardW56
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2003
    • 5901

    Originally posted by Centurion_D
    Is anyone else beginning to sweat bullets about SB 427, SB 819, AB 144 and AB 809. I understand the Gov has till midnight tonight to veto these bills. Is that correct?
    I believe it is midnight tomorrow... Or 12:00 AM on the 10th


    But it wouldn't be the first time I've been24 hours off....
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #3
      Centurion_D
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2005
      • 1983

      Originally posted by HowardW56
      I believe it is midnight tomorrow... Or 12:00 AM on the 10th
      Opps...I stand corrected.

      Comment

      • #4
        Skidmark
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 1808

        Originally posted by Centurion_D
        Is anyone else beginning to sweat bullets about SB 427, SB 819, AB 144 and AB 809. I understand the Gov has till midnight tonight to veto these bills. Is that correct?
        Plenty of discussion on Brown's pending action on these bills here: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=476965
        Making guns illegal is as stupid as making drugs or prostitution illegal.

        Comment

        • #5
          Connor P Price
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 1897

          He's going to do whatever he wants to do. I'm sure he's known the whole time what his position will be, so I'm not stressing. No sense fussing over something predetermined. I am quite interested that he's saving them for last though.
          Originally posted by wildhawker
          Calguns Foundation: "Advancing your civil rights, and helping you win family bets, since 2008."

          -Brandon

          Comment

          • #6
            SwissFluCase
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            • Jul 2008
            • 1322

            Originally posted by Connor P Price
            He's going to do whatever he wants to do. I'm sure he's known the whole time what his position will be, so I'm not stressing. No sense fussing over something predetermined. I am quite interested that he's saving them for last though.
            Are you kidding, this is a cliff hanger of epic proportions!

            Regards,


            SwissFluCase
            "We don't discuss the governor's arsenal in detail" - Brown spokeswoman Elizabeth Ashford

            Comment

            • #7
              SantaCabinetguy
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2011
              • 15137

              If he doesn't explicitly veto them AND doesn't sign them into law, its de facto vetoed yes? This would allow him to veto the law and later on go "well I just didn't have the time" and appease the other side.
              Hauoli Makahiki Hou


              -------

              Comment

              • #8
                Swiss
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 830

                I thought it's the other way - not signing or vetoing allows them to pass into law
                Being pro-gun rights in the Bay Area is like being a vegan at an Outback Steakhouse. You know you're right but nobody gives a damn.

                Comment

                • #9
                  SupportGeek
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 752

                  Originally posted by Ubermcoupe
                  If he doesn't explicitly veto them AND doesn't sign them into law, its de facto vetoed yes? This would allow him to veto the law and later on go "well I just didn't have the time" and appease the other side.
                  IIRC, California works exactly the opposite way.
                  If he doesnt sign it, and doesnt explicitly veto, it becomes law anyhow.

                  Its messed up. IMO, there should be a clear and definite action taken on every bill (Yes/No for Veto). None of this "let it slide" crap.
                  Originally posted by oaklander
                  At this point, you are not even playing checkers, you are playing marbles, and it appears that some of yours may have been misplaced.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    RazzB7
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 3419

                    Originally posted by Ubermcoupe
                    If he doesn't explicitly veto them AND doesn't sign them into law, its de facto vetoed yes? This would allow him to veto the law and later on go "well I just didn't have the time" and appease the other side.
                    Nope. That's what he's going to do to US!
                    Originally posted by Conan the Barbarian
                    Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing
                    Originally posted by MrsRazz
                    I don't wish to be known as a set of tits behind a gun.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Maestro Pistolero
                      Veteran Member
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 3897

                      I just tweeted the governor. Hopefully he'll get it in time to find his pen before midnight.
                      www.christopherjhoffman.com

                      The Second Amendment is the one right that is so fundamental that the inability to exercise it, should the need arise, would render all other rights null and void. Dead people have no rights.
                      Magna est veritas et praevalebit

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        SwissFluCase
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 1322

                        He's working today...

                        Regards,


                        SwissFluCase
                        "We don't discuss the governor's arsenal in detail" - Brown spokeswoman Elizabeth Ashford

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          SantaCabinetguy
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Feb 2011
                          • 15137

                          Originally posted by SupportGeek
                          IIRC, California works exactly the opposite way.
                          If he doesnt sign it, and doesnt explicitly veto, it becomes law anyhow.
                          Leave it to CA to be different...

                          Jerry better get his posterior in gear and get signing!
                          Hauoli Makahiki Hou


                          -------

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            HowardW56
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 5901

                            Originally posted by Ubermcoupe
                            Leave it to CA to be different...

                            Jerry better get his posterior in gear and get signing!

                            The Governors office just issued another press release...

                            He just signed or vetoed a bunch of environmental bills, storage tanks, utilities...
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Connor P Price
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 1897

                              Originally posted by SwissFluCase
                              Are you kidding, this is a cliff hanger of epic proportions!

                              Regards,


                              SwissFluCase
                              I guess you can look at it as a cliffhanger because we don't know the answer yet. I just don't view it that way.

                              I look at this like a complex algebraic formula I haven't learned how to solve yet. Sure, I don't know the answer yet, but its predetermined and it will be the same no matter how or when I figure it out. Not much of a cliffhanger when the decision has essentially already been made.

                              Then again, I'm not all that excitable.
                              Originally posted by wildhawker
                              Calguns Foundation: "Advancing your civil rights, and helping you win family bets, since 2008."

                              -Brandon

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1